I know blogs get comments.
I receive a few myself sometimes.
But, by far, the easiest part of blog writing is that there is nobody
sitting beside me, calling me on my uncensored ramblings, no adversarial
sounding board to say,
“Yeah, that didn’t quite happen the way you described it.”
“You seem have excluded certain obvious contradictory
examples.”
“That’s just plain nonsense.”
And
“That’s sick!”
Challenges of that nature.
There is no keeping-one-honest mechanism in the blog-writing
apparatus. I just rattle away at my computer
and my unedited blathering flies out into the cyberspatial ether. Once in a while, I will blow the whistle on myself
by including acknowledging reactions
to my unchallenged assertions via the interjections of “Italics Man” or “Blue Writing Man” and at least on one occasion, “Blue Writing Italics Man.”
I include these remonstrative interjections at times when I can
simply no longer tolerate myself, and I require somebody, if only a self-fabricated “somebody”, to remedially take
me to task. (Other than my readers, many of whom I can imagine needing
ocular rehabilitation, suffering from a dangerous excess of “Rolling of the Eyes.”)
It is not that I don’t believe what I’m saying. Why else would I say it? It’s just that leaving my assertions
uncontested sometimes stretches my capacity for self-delusion to a degree I
cannot, in good conscience, allow to stand, meaning that though I will not back
away from my assertions, I will admittedly acknowledge that many, most or
possibly all of them are seriously
open to dispute.
But that’s only when I notice
such excesses. There have quite likely been
numerous occasions where I dished out my highly questionable perspectives
without raising a skeptical eyebrow, because I was unaware just how far out on
a limb I had actually ventured. So even this exonerating assertion is not immune
to qualification. It is not that I let
stuff go; it’s that, on those occasions, I am totally oblivious to how
ridiculous it sounds.
This limitation to my purported self-oversight returned to
mind after yesterday writing, in my most self-congratulatory manner, in a blog
post called “In”, that I democratically “treated everybody the same.”
It took a day to remind myself that this lofty
assertion is not entirely factual. As a
gesture of self-purification, or if that’s too out-in-the-deserty, simply fessing
up to my dishonesties, I find it necessary to correct the record with this
contradicting recollection.
We were attending a play at an outdoor amphitheater, when,
while we were heading for our seats, a woman cradling a baby called out my
name. I turned to her, offering my
always-endearing reaction, indicating “I have no idea who you are.” I may actually have literally professed, in a
mistaken expression of salvaging disingenuousness, “I have no idea who you
are.”
The woman kindly reminded me that, maybe a decade and half
or so earlier, she had served on the production staff of a series I had created
and Executive Produced called Best of the
West.
It is always an uncomfortable moment when somebody
recognizes me and I am unable reciprocate.
I invariably cover with “concerned chatter”, as I did this time, asking the woman how she’s
doing, and in this case the name and age of her baby. (Which I assiduously kept “gender neutral”
because with some babies it is not easy to tell and, having already dug myself
a hole, I did not want to sink any further by saying “What’s his name?” and
hearing back “Amanda.”)
Finally, I completed what I believed was an acceptable
effort at placating the bruised feelings of a woman I had obliterated from my
memory, and we departed for our seats.
All through the show, however, my dismissal of her existence continued
to haunt me, feeling naggingly uncertain that my cursory ingratiations had
satisfactorily settled the bill.
When the play ended, I deliberately made my way back to
where the woman was sitting, hoping to cap off the encounter with a spontaneous
gesture of demonstrated interest, so that she
could go home happy, and I could go
home guilt-free.
“What exactly did you do on Best of the West?” I inquired in my most ingratiating timbre.
To which the woman replied,
“I was your Personal Assistant.”
“I treated everybody the same”?
Sorry, not that
time.
--------------------------------------------------
Happy Canada Day! I am not legally you anymore. But a big part of me - the way I think, the way I feel about things, the way I behave - still pure, unadulterated Canadian. And I couldn't be happier about that.
In the category of "Character Underpinnings" if nothing else - and there is something else, hockey - Canada is arguably at least among the greatest countries in the world.
Thanks for the sensible grounding, Canada. I'd have been nowhere without it.
I just wrote "And you know what? It's okay to brag. At least one day a year." But I took it out.
It sounds way too American.
--------------------------------------------------
Happy Canada Day! I am not legally you anymore. But a big part of me - the way I think, the way I feel about things, the way I behave - still pure, unadulterated Canadian. And I couldn't be happier about that.
In the category of "Character Underpinnings" if nothing else - and there is something else, hockey - Canada is arguably at least among the greatest countries in the world.
Thanks for the sensible grounding, Canada. I'd have been nowhere without it.
I just wrote "And you know what? It's okay to brag. At least one day a year." But I took it out.
It sounds way too American.
1 comment:
Funny story - your very own personal assistant. But I guess that means you were none too personal and, perhaps, her assists did not lead to anything memorable. Or it's just a reminder of the fragility of our memories.
Happy Canada Day! Were there any special functions held in Santa Monica by all the Canadian ex-pats in your neighborhood?
Post a Comment