Did you ever visit your
cherished old house and find out it's a dust pile?
Not long ago, I was reading an article in the Sunday New York Times magazine about the
changing face of television, interesting to me because I once worked in
television, though not entirely
interesting because I now don’t.
The article spoke of the fierce competitive battle between
streaming services, like Netflix and Amazon Prime and “Premium Cable”, like HBO and Showtime.
The gist of the article, which I did not entirely understand
nor care much that I didn’t was that
the filthy rich streaming services were swamping the airwaves with “product”, offering
premiering new series after new series, while snail-like “Premium Cable” took
its “developmental” sweet time, highlighting quality over inundating quantity. (Possibly because that is their preferred
strategy, or possibly because they’re just poorer.)
The probing question was, “How long could ‘Premium Cable’
maintain its deliberate ‘Business Model against the streaming services
rampaging output?” There was talk about
one streaming service spreading their audience-snaring net by developing “Game
Shows.” Would elegant HBO soon follow suit, the Times journalist wondered? Would they inevitably have to to keep up?
In truth, I did not care about any of that. Reading the
article, what struck me most powerfully was not
what was in it, but what dramatically
was not.
There was not single mention of the commercially broadcast
television networks.
“You mean, ‘Grandpa’?”
Because that’s how it sounded, the now irrelevant once three
and then four “major networks” bumped off the conversational radar, like they
effectively no longer existed.
The networks!
We are talking about here.
“How the mighty have
fallen!”
I mean, those guys controlled everything! What “show
pitcher” of my day did not quiver, awaiting the determining verdict of an
omnipotent network president? The urgent
clamoring chatter was,
“Did you hear from Freddy?”
“What did Brandon say?“
“I heard Jeff liked it.
But it wasn’t from Jeff.”
We hung on every overheard word and morsel of gossip, tipping
the mood of those powerful moguls with Kindergarten names.
Emperors of the airwaves, whose unappealable “Thumbs up” or
“Thumbs down” decreed if you could buy a house, or once in my case since I already had a house that was being totally remodeled,
if I could pay for a roof.
These people were stars in their own right. Famed Freddy Silverman, dubbed “The Man With
The Golden Gut”, ran all three networks.
(Although not at the same time.) Brandon Tartikoff guested on Hollywood Squares. Rubbing shoulders with Paul Lynde!
These people were big…
is what I’m telling you. Now, all that
is… still there.
But smaller. Although – and a smile immediately arises
anticipating the following – due to some mesmerizing “Hoo-doo”, network
advertising departments have convinced sponsors to pay more for the privilege of
reaching the shrunken “Premium” audience than for audiences that were multiple
times larger, proving you can fool
some of the people all of the time. All of them if they’re sponsors.
I have discussed the thrilling arrival of the annual TV Guide Fall Preview Edition.
That TV “high” was entirely about networks, and the “glittering
baubles” they were set to unveil. Who cares
what networks unveil today? Not whoever wrote that New York Times magazine article. Although that
subject may be the follow-up sequel:
“Network Television: The
Invisible Enterprise.”
NETWORK TELEVISION: “We’re
still here. Going to the Emmys and coming home empty.”
Once there was “Greatness.”
Massively watched “giants” – Seinfeld,
Friends, Everybody Loves Raymond – the last of them gone from network
schedules for a decade-and-a-half. The Big Bang Theory recently ruled the
ratings, but with one third of the
audience. (We can debate “relative
quality.” I won’t listen, but we can
debate it.)
Changing the subject but not really, did you ever walk
through some cavernous department store – not just going from the “Food Court”
to the parking lot – and there were no people in there, and you wonder “How do
they stay open?”
A lot of them don’t. (Because they cannot convince vendors that less
customers means more profits. The
networks are still there (due to the advertising “witchcraft”) but “Where are
the people?”
Sure, times change. Goodbye,
department stores, hello “specialty boutiques.”
(Streaming services being “specialty
boutiques” owned by one person.)
But it feels weird. A
whole article about television, and not a word about networks, dominant powerhouses, pushed to the
sidelines.
Watching the show.
And wondering what happened.
------------------------------------------------
Note: Although she would be a sparkling addition to this venue, for confidentiality purposes, Dr. M would never participate in this process. Nice thought. But "No can do."
------------------------------------------------
Note: Although she would be a sparkling addition to this venue, for confidentiality purposes, Dr. M would never participate in this process. Nice thought. But "No can do."
1 comment:
Earl said:
Note: Although she would be a sparkling addition to this venue, for confidentiality purposes, Dr. M would never participate in this process. Nice thought. But "No can do."
It was worth a try. Thank you for looking into the possibility.
Post a Comment