Which may have already
left town because it wasn’t that popular but I am writing about it anyway,
possibly identifying with the unpopularity.
Or because it’s a well-meaning movie and don’t we all need one during
times like our own.
British screenwriter/director Richard Curtis who specializes
in appealing romantic comedies – quintessentially exemplified by Love Actually, which ought to have a
comma between “Love” and “Actually” but inexplicably does not – has crafted a
warmhearted fantasy that may not rise
to the level of “Nice going” but satisfactorily reaches the standard of “Nice
trying.”
Here’s the problem I have with science-fiction.
“Wait. Is ‘Yesterday’ science fiction?”
No.
“Then, why did you
mention…”
I am getting to it, okay?
“First day back from
vacation?”
Yes.
“Then we will cut you
some slack. Meander away at your
leisure.”
Thank you.
My problem with science-fiction is that it seems annoyingly
arbitrary. An imagined world is created
where they now do this when they used
to do that. (A generalization, although generally
correct.)
My brother and another comedy writer were working on a
futuristic premise about a planet that was exactly like earth except for one
thing. My brother pitched the
distinguishing difference about the virtually identical planet: “They don’t have Pepsi.” To which the other
comedy writer spontaneously replied:
“They have Pepsi.
But they drink it hot!”
To me, that’s science-fiction. They make crazy stuff up and we’re supposed
to go, “Sure.”
So – belatedly, though some people don’t mind – with Yesterday.
(Spoiler Alert:
I am giving everything away.)
A struggling, young singer/songwriter slams into a bus
during a brief, worldwide blackout, and when he comes to, no one remembers the Beatles but him. (They also have no
concept of Coca Cola, smoking,
cigarettes and in the film’s “Here we go again” fade-out, Harry Potter.) (But it could be anything, right?)
Pretending he wrote them himself, the young singer/songwriter
builds his career performing the entire Beatles
songbook, becoming wildly successful on the back of this great, purloined
material.
Complications ensue.
Most of them predictable, though not excruciatingly so.
Except, complains
the “Inspector Javert” of logical unlikelihood,
How did he remember all of the words to all of those
songs? (There is one joke about his
mangling the lyrics to “For The Benefit of Mr. Kite”, but come on! A guy in his twenties
with no displayed interest in the Beatles
recalls everything else?”
“Go with the flow,
baby. They drink it hot.”
And he’s the only one
who remembers? (It turns out he isn’t,
providing the storyline a surprising “twist.”
I have ruined everything else, but I shall keep that one a secret. I guess I’m as unreliable as sci-fi.)
There is also a sweet interlude in which the song-stealing
scalawag meets an undead and unfamous – weirdly believable-looking – John
Lennon, who offers a North-Star- focusing message of nurturing love and unwavering
truthfulness.
That scene is just shimmering.
Also a treat are snippets of clever dialogue Curtis is known
for, as in when his artless manager opines about the kid’s one self-written song
– and I quote, almost verbatim:
“I hate that song. I’m
not exactly sure why. But I hate it too
much to listen to it again to try and figure it out.”
The manager also insists on changing the classic Beatles anthem to “Hey, Dude!”
I believe there are at least three things in the movie I haven’t
given away, so I’d say it is still worth seeing. If only for the gentle good feelings it sends
out.
A flawed film, making you feel somewhat better?
Thank you, Richard Curtis.
Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
Wait. I just stole
from Simon and Garfunkel.
A propos, I would
say.
(As opposed to “glaring easy way out.”)
Oh well.
It is my first day
back.
Written on Monday, August
5, 2019.
1 comment:
Yes, it was a great movie. How John was alive would seem like a subject for a different movie although my concept of John Lennon, intellectual and brutally honest was upheld. The performance from the star was spellbinding.
Post a Comment