But I fear no one is
listening.
It seems I do not change as fast as “change” wants me to change. Not that I don’t change at all. I change all the time. I used to wear calf-high gym socks; now I
wear anklets. I used to eat cow cheese;
now I eat goat cheese. And I am working tirelessly towards squeezing the toothpaste
tube from the bottom.
I am a veritable whirlwind of change.
It’s just that I like to change at my own pace, and “change”
itself seems to change faster.
There is also the question of “choice” – the difference
between moving, and being evicted.
I can identify with those beleaguered coal miners. Mining coal is what they know, it’s what they
do, and what they want to keep doing. And no “No-‘count ‘Outsider’s’” going to get
them to stop.
Such thoughts came roilingly to mind after reading a
response in Ken Levine’s “Friday Questions” (on his reliable blog bykenlevine), where Ken mentions, and I
quote, because when Ken “mentions”, I listen:
“… fewer people now
read blogs.”
Uh-oh.
That’s the blacksmith at the dawn of the “Car Era” hearing,
“… fewer people now
ride horses.”
Now I may be jumpin’ the gun here, but if Ken’s admonition
wasn’t “Time’s up!” it sounds like “Time’s up!” is precipitously down the road.
I don’t want “Time” up
till I’m ready. Is that too much to ask? (To which the answer is “Yes.”)
Sometimes, as Ken goes on to reports, after writing a blog a
while, it gets increasingly harder to come up with new post ideas. In my experience “feast or famine” happens in
waves. Scribbled ideas on mini-yellow
pads all over the house mix with inspirational droughts.
These temporary “slow times”, I believe, arise because I
have uncharacteristically stopped noticing.
I temperamentally see myself as an “interested noticer”, most
particularly of “little things”, offering “noticings” for people with brains more
productively applied elsewhere.
This is is the service I provide, a “Personal Shopper” of
“noticings”, for those too busy to notice things themselves. It seems to work fine. I am not
busy, and the “noticing” recipients seem grateful.
I am not alone in this peculiar proclivity. A recent Lyft
driver regaled me with his musings
about an emporium he drove past called Lamps
Plus, piquing his interest and his concern.
He understood they could not just call the place “Lamps”. But what exactly
were they talking about when it came to the “Plus”?
I immediately identified with his curiosity about store
names. Lamps Plus, I proposed, came from the same “branding philosophy” as
Bed, Bath and Beyond. I then wondered if there was ever “Inventory
Clash”, “Lamp’s” available “Pluses” being identical to Bed, Bath’s “Beyonds.”
With such uncertain labeling, you could never be certain. Needing to buy something, you are unsure if
it’s a “Plus” or a “Beyond.”
All of which made the drive home enjoyably faster.
When you do a blog called “Just Thinking” – and my sped-up
heartbeat just warned me “Don’t say this!” but it is too late to stop now – ideas
for posts appear unlimited.
(Stay tuned for Fate’s punishing “dry spell.” Or don’t, ‘cause there’ll be nothing to
read.)
Seems to me, if I remain open and don’t get to too sad or neurotically
unhinged awaiting medical results, I can keep “rollin’ along, singin’ a song.”
But, if as Ken observers, “… fewer people now read blogs”, it won’t matter if I’ve still got
ideas.
Will there be readers to read them?
It is only by erroneous accident that I occasionally learn how
many “followers” I have. (The most
frequently asked question by people who know me, none of whom are reading my
blog.) (And, by the way, “followers”
suddenly sounds creepy.)
I write this blog – falling into quetionable patios – because I likes to. People reading
it is a bonus.
But what happens if they stop? (And I
eventually find out?)
Ken is already immersed in his podcast, apparently the next
communicational outlet. (Unless there’s
a still newer one and I am two communicational outlets behind. Like I am a number of Apple cell phones behind. (I
can now just call people over seventy.)
Here’s how slow I am, and not just “slow to change.”
This post was supposed to build to the borderline virtual impossibility
of my transitioning to podcasts.
And I am just getting there now.
I may try that one next time.
Unless the “End of Blogging” is closer than I thought,
And they turn the lights out tonight.
VETERAN MINER: “I am still digging coal.”
Would you still dig it if no one was buying it?
“That’s
a strange question to ask.”
Ken Levine tells me that’s coming. And I’ve not known him to be wrong.
“Who’s Ken Levine? Some no-’count ‘Outsider’?”
4 comments:
I'm here, Earl. Been here for years and plan to continue to be here.
I guess it depends on what you expect of your blog. You seem to really enjoy writing your blog and put a lot of thought into your writing. And that's why I read it. It's entertaining and thought provoking. It's not always easy reading, though. I find I have to come back to some posts to get the full effect. Or sometimes it means holding the thought to read a few posts to understand your idea.
I get the feeling that you'd write this blog whether anyone read it or not. But if the number of readers was really that important, you could always switch to writing about the current guy occupying the White House (either pro or con) and you'd get lots of readers and lots of comments. Or you could start making up news about famous people (what some call Click Bait) to get lots of readers. I don't think you'd be happy, though.
I'm 68 years old and I'm used to reading blog-length posts, books and magazine articles as opposed to one-sentence captions accompanying endless pictures of what famous people are wearing that day. But a lot of people like that.
Or you, too, could start a podcast. I tend to not listen to podcasts because you have to put ear buds or headphones on and, with my already declining hearing, it means I miss my family and co-workers asking me questions or trying to talk with me.
You were on Ken Levine's podcast once for a very entertaining episode but I have to tell you I had to find just the right time to listen when I knew no one would need my attention. And you must have seen all the trouble Ken had to go through to get his equipment set up and make the recordings correctly. I assume he edits the session at some point. That takes time, too. And another thing about podcasts - with a blog, at least on Blogger, you can search through old posts for something you vaguely remember (I remember looking up an old post of yours about one of your stories about working at Harrod's) and I don't know how you'd do that on a podcast. I'd rather read Ken Levine's blog than listen to his podcast. But that's just me.
You've got ideas you want people to know about and you want to pick the best method to get those ideas out. It's up to you, of course, but just picking a method because it is the latest thing may not be the best choice. The coal miners got jobs because coal was more energy dense than wood and coal was the latest, greatest thing. They had to work underground, got Black Lung and weren't paid very much but the work was steady. For a while. Until the next new thing came along.
Just back from a European vacation so catching up on what you have been thinking about. During dry spells you could think about things your readers would like your thoughts on. For example, why would someone without a gluten intolerance decide to avoid foods with gluten?
Ken is right about many things, but he is wrong about this. People go back to blogs as they get tired of the noise of social media and want more thoughtful engagement. Podcasts are having a boom right now, it's true, but at some point there'll be a shakeout. In any case, people can listen to podcasts in their cars and on their daily commute. Blogs serve a different need.
wg
Post a Comment