Wednesday, September 25, 2019

"Railroad Of Reason"


We are “Reasoning People.”  But are we really that good at it?

I believed I had been bitten on the leg in the backyard.

Wait.  That’s not exactly correct.

It sounds like there are a lot of legs strewn about the premises, and the one on which I believe I was bitten was the leg in the backyard.

Let me try that again.

Standing in the backyard, I believed I had been bitten on the leg.

No, that’s-a no good either.

Do I believe I had been bitten on the leg only when I am standing in the backyard, or do I believe I had been bitten on the leg standing anywhere?

There must be a “right” way to say this.  Lemme see.

---------------------------------------

Nope.  I shall just have to leave it inaccurate.

This post is not about precision in writing.  (Though it easily could be.)  It is instead about this:

Two days after I believe I had been bitten on the leg in the backyard,

My lips swelled to about twice their usual size, their “usual size”, already substantial. 

That’s a whole lot of lip.

I see myself as a reasoning “Man with a Mind.”  A problem arises, and I immediately look for an answer.  I’m like a superhero, though by batting average of success suggests “No sequels.”

Anyway, let’s get to work.

Following the “bite on the leg” hypothesis, I take anti-histamine medicine, and on the advice of a nutritionist, squeeze drops of a homeopathic insect “antigen” under my tongue. 

None of it helped.

Why?

Because my labial reaction was not, in fact, “bite on the leg”-related.  (Raising the possibility that I had not been bitten on the leg in the backyard at all.)

Though I had followed a faulty trail, a “Man with a Mind” never gives up. 

He keeps searching for answers.

Which he knows he will find.

For he is “A Man with a Mind.”

We then went to Michiana on vacation, Dr. M, myself, and my super-sized lips.  (Which, with an American Airlines Gold Card, fly free.)

Almost immediately, things started to get worse, the celebrated “Lippa-Palooza” joined by a drippy “congestion” symptom, accompanied by coughing.

The “smart money” remains on “I’m allergic.”  The “Man with A Mind” challenge is:

“To what?”

Suddenly, everything seems like a “possibility.”  And, in our uncertain reasoning process, becomes one.

“It’s dust mites.”  (Our Michiana cabin undoubtedly has dust mites, and twenty years ago, I was told that was the one thing I was allergic to.)

“It’s mold.”  (Our Michiana cabin unquestionably had mold.  And a friend of Rachel’s, suffering from fat lips had determined the reason was mold, and that woman is a scientist!)

Passing the “Fruits and Vegetables” aisle in Barney’s supermarket, I see cartons of strawberries.  (Did I remember to wash those strawberries I ate the day I thought I was bitten on the leg in the backyard but perhaps wasn’t, or if I was it had nothing to do with my lips?)

“Maybe it’s the strawberries.”

Later that day, eating the “Lake Perch” at Casey’s I had an enormous coughing fit.

“Maybe it’s the fish.”

(For a while, I had powerful suspicions about our rental car.  Set in brackets because it’s embarrassing.)

Suddenly, like those “noir” movies where somebody goes nuts and circling “faces” jabber around them, it was like,

“It’s dust mites!”

“It’s mold!”

“It’s strawberries!”

“It’s the fish!”

The person, clutching their head till they finally go mad.

When we got home, I went to an allergist.  Checking my (rapidly growing) list of ingested “Medicines and Supplements”, she quickly determined through research that my blood pressure medicine sometimes presented such symptoms.

“But I’ve been taking it for ten years!” I exclaimed.

“Duddn’t matter,” she replied.

I find it difficult to trust a doctor who says “Duddn’t.”  But, with the agreement of my Personal Care Physician – who says “doesn’t” – it turned out the allergist was right.

I switched blood pressure medicines, and in days, my lips returns to their normal pillowy selves.

I’m not sure I can help it.  I will continue to propose answers, although I consistently, borderline ludicrously, fail.

Two days later, I develop a persistent tickle in my throat.

“All aboard for the “The Wrong Reason Express.”

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

"Plus Ca Change"


I was thinking of writing a post about “If I were working in television today, what kinds of shows I would pitch to the networks?”

Then I realized the futility of expecting to receive “now” ideas from a “back then”-derived brain.

That’s trying to drive a new-model car, using a key.

(It’s all “sensors” now…. is what I am saying.)

Then, as a “back-up” idea, I pondered, with somewhat lowered enthusiasm, the problem of today’s writers, pitching to the networks, wondering if it is easier or harder now than in bygone eras.

My reflexive response is that it’s got to be harder.  (With the implied, “Man, I’m sure glad I don’t have to do that anymore”, making me feel better for being unable to.

Seriously, with the sitcom format failing to excite and no “hot shows” definitively “pointing the way”, looking for some chance of “rising from the sludge”, pitching to networks today – it has to be different. 

Then, I saw that, at least in one way, it isn’t.

They are still scheduling “ands…”

So – Duh! – the “Creatives” are still pitching “ands…”

It’s true.  I just saw a “promo” for one, scheduled on CBS, Mondays at 8:30.

(Side note, adding some “heft” to the proceedings.  When attorneys are searching for cases to argue that have the best odds of reaching the Supreme Court, they look for “splits” – cases garnering contrary outcomes from lower federal courts, which the Supreme Court must necessarily decide.  Similarly, your best odds of getting a network show picked up is, and always has been, offering an “and…”

What’s an “and…”?

(Which, by the way, does not necessarily have “and” in its title.)

It’s a show about “diametrical opposites.”

Bridget Loves Bernie (offering the relationship between a Jew and a Catholic.)

Dharma and Gregg (offering the relationship between a hippie and striver)

Mork and Mindy (offering a relationship between an Earthling and an alien)

Laverne and Shirley (offering a relationship between a… no, they’re the same.)

And now, showing that, though pitching to networks may have changed, this hasn’t –

Presenting…

Bob Hearts Abishola

(With an emogi heart in the title instead of the word)

The sitcom that screams “and…”

As in,

“Offering the relationship between a typical American and a woman from Africa.”

Demonstrating that amazingly, after all this time,

They are still doing the “and...”

At least when Chuck Lorre is involved.

Chuck (Two and a Half Men, The Big Band Theory, Young Sheldon, Mom) Lorre is currently the most successful sitcom impresario in network television.  Here, imaginably, though not outrageously, is how Bob Hearts Abishola got on the air.

“Chuck Lorre’s on the phone.”

“Hello?”

“Hey, it’s Chuck Lorre.”

“You got Mondays, at 8:30.”

Some “pitches” go easier than others.

And so here we go again, with a show involving an “unlikely relationship”, headed for definite hijinks, because, as the Wikipedia “Premise Summary” explains,

“… they could not be more different.”

Did somebody just yawn?

Oh, wait.  It was me.

Being a fair man hungry for comedy, I am going to give Bob Hearts Abishola a chance.  Chuck Lorre, is known for peppering his scripts with, especially early in the series, really good jokes, so there is good reason to “sample.”

Mostly, however, I’ll be watching for curiosity reasons, wondering,

“Can an ‘and…’ sitcom still score deep in the twenty first century?

If it can’t, then it’s back to the original question:

“What do you pitch to the networks today?”

Man, I’m sure glad I don’t have to do that anymore.

(Said with 89% relief, and just 11% regret.)

Monday, September 23, 2019

"Rarest Of The Rare"


“Help!”

We were watching a show about Scottish dancing.  (Read:  “Desperate”, rather than “curious about Celtic Terpsichore.”) 

Having been asked the typical question about what he wears under his kilt, the male performer briskly replied, “Noothing!”  At that point, as he vigorously went through his traditional paces – I mean he was really bouncing around – my mind immediately went, “I don’t want to think about this!”

Thankfully, I was rescued by a Scottish-themed recollection.

I received Local Hero to think about instead.

Local Hero (1983), written and directed by Scottish filmmaker Bill Forsyth is, for me, an enchanted movie with a sublime plot twist.

I don’t know if Americans (including even Canadian Americans) could make such a movie.  It may, in fact, be a unique “sensibility” issue, limited to places, comfortable with “commando” clog dancing.  I don’t know.

It’s just different.

I should have known Bill Forsyth was special.  Our introduction to him was Gregory’s Girl (1981), a light-hearted teen romance with another “sublime plot twist.”

Catching the audience totally off guard.

Standard Romantic Comedy Movie Template:  Somebody sets their sights on another person and, overcoming seeming impossible obstacles, wins their affections forever. 

In Gregory’s Girl, throughout the film, Gregory sets his sights on one girl.  And in the end, he, fully contentedly, winds up with another girl, who apparently had had her sights set on him. 

I cannot tell you how refreshing that felt.  A movie where the end is actually a surprise.  Making it a “compound surprise” – the surprise itself, and the fact that there was one.  

I mean, credit where credit is due to any professional screenwriter who can wring fresh excitement out of a threadbare format whose “payoff” we see coming from “Fade In.”  Still, it can’t help but get tiresome.  This guy thought, “Why does he have to end up with her?  (Or “Sad Sackily” end up with nobody?)  I’ll bring in a new girl, and give everybody a treat!”  

Two years later Forsyth treats us again, perhaps even more so, with Local Hero.

Standard “Corporate Bully” Movie Template:  (Or so we think.)  

Big bucks oil company swoops down on an idyllic Scottish community way to the north, planning to buy the entire town, tear it down, building a State-of-the-Art new refinery in its place.

And there you have it. 

“Corporate Bully” – “Boo!” 

Helpless working class people, facing decimating extinction.

Can a Bernie Sanders “cameo” be far behind?

Well, this is “pixie dust” Bill Forsyth country”, so all bets are off.

And by “pixie dust”, (which may, in fact, have been misused), I do not mean
“magical outcome.”  (Although the “meteor showers” are breathtakingly miraculous, so, perhaps, “part marks.”)

The sweet “surprise” is Local Hero is the following:

The townspeople want to sell out.  (They pretend they don’t so they can jack up the price.)

Don’t get me wrong.  This isn’t some cynical screenwriter going, “They expect ‘A’; I shall hit them with ‘B’”.  Not a bit of it.  The quirky townspeople are totally credible as lucky “lottery winners”, already debating which luxury automobile is the best.   

The rarest of the rare:

A film that organically goes its own narrative way.  And succeeds.  (I know.  “Tarantino.”  But, please.)

We need more Bill Forsyths working in movies, instead of the number we currently have, which is nobody.

Oh well.  There is always the memory (and video) of Local Hero.

A memory that delights.

And also, mercifully, distracts.