Tuesday, February 23, 2016

"'No Sale', Yet I Feel Obligated To Try"

There is an English actor named Michael Gambon (“Professor Albus Dumbledore” in the Harry Potter movies) who in a play I once saw him in was miraculously able to instill a congenitally boring character with a death grip on the audience’s attention.  Although, as written, the character was screamingly uninteresting, when he appeared on stage, it was impossible to take your eyes off him.

I am nowhere near that talented.  At my best, I am, as a writer, generally able to make interesting stories interesting.  If they are not, however, like fish falling below the “keeper” category, I am proclaimed (new word)  to throw the substandard specimen back.

This situation is particularly vexing when I think I have reeled in a particularly “good one” and it turns out…

It isn’t.

End of pescatorial analogies.

The foregoing was included to explain why I have been holding back committing the following incident to blogatorial scrutiny. 

“Did you have to write it at all?”

A reasonable question, Blue Italics Person, but for some inexplicable reason, although a borderline example, the answer is yes.  If you are a professional, sometimes, like a pitcher taking the mound without his best stuff, you have to suck it up and pound that strike zone as best as you can.

End of baseball analogies.

Backstory

It was determined that two of my wisdom teeth had to come out.  I was dreading that inevitability like Doomsday.  More than heart surgery.  I know that’s bizarro, but I had never had heart surgery and I had had teeth pulled.  And – “Massive Understatement Alert!” – I did not care for the experience. 

Adding to that nightmarish recollection was a family rumor that my paternal grandfather had died having a tooth removed.  It may not have been a wisdom tooth, but what difference did that make? 

Evidentiary Factoid:  A tooth extraction could kill you.  Okay, it was 1945, and that might make a difference.  On the other hand it might not.  What if I have a genetic predisposition for dying in the chair?

That would scare anyone, wouldn’t it?  Supplementing the memory of my own “Rendezvous with Dentistry” where they put me “put under” with ether?  (It smells like burning rubber.)  I am aware they don’t use that anymore.  But when you’re frightened – and borderline crazy – and you’ve been accessorizing that encounter for north of half a century…

All things considered:  It was not going to be good.

I did everything I could think of to get ready.  The week before my appointment, I doubled up on my meditation, hoping to float into Perdition on the blissful accompaniment of Om.  (My haircutter, who caps all of my haircuts with a blessing, gave me a meditation CD, which I immediately appended to my routine.  Before you knew it, I was meditating up a storm.

Also, invoking the assistance of “Guided Imagery”, I conjured the vision of “Iron Earl”, the protective adult portion of my personality – yes, I have one – who vowed to be with me every step of the way, so I would never, as Oscar Hammerstein poetically put it, walk alone.

On the appointed “Day of Reckoning”, I wore a t-shirt – on view in my official “Birthday Picture” – featuring the “The Great Ones” – a Mount Rushmore replication with the faces of four renowned Indian chiefs chiseled onto it instead of the presidents. 

On top of that I wore a sweatshirt adorned with the fully head-dressed profile of another (unidentified) Indian chief. 

I wanted to “face the music” with an indomitable posse. 

And now I was ready.

My apprehension nominally relieved by the “Consolation Prize” known to all writers facing difficult times:

“At least I’ll get story out of it.”

I show up or my appointment.  They put me to sleep and they do what has to be done.

What can I tell you?

I will not say, “It was nothing.”

But it wasn’t that much.

Not that I would enjoy having my teeth extracted on a regular basis,

But it was not at all terrible.  (Expensive, maybe, but not terrible.) 

I went home in a fog of nitrous oxide and general anesthetic.  When it wore off, I took painkillers, although my condition rarely rose to the level of actual “pain.”  (And by the way, I could do without the word “painkiller.”)

I spend my “Recovery Day” watching Pee Wee’s Great Adventure with my daughter. 

There was some bleeding, rounds of gauze applications. Later, when there were questions or concerns, we called the kind and patient Dental Assistant Veronica who would set us straight on how to deal with them. 

Also included were servings of soft food.  Cream of rice, mashed potatoes and baby food. 

A dress rehearsal for ninety.

A few days later, save for the two brand new excavational areas in my mouth…

I was back to normal.

What did I tell you?

It is not much of a story.

Would I have traded a rockier experience for a superior anecdote?

No.

But, like all writers I imagine…


I am a little disappointed.

Monday, February 22, 2016

"Thinking About 'Hail, Caesar!"

Something interests me about the Coen Brothers who appear to make movies for their mutual enjoyment and if other people like them that’s okay too making a movie set in the “Studio System”, a workplace where the “Creatives” were notoriously subservient to the people in charge.  I wondered what it be like if those diametrical entities came head-to-head. 

(Note:  This may turn out to be terrible.  But what can I tell you?  It’s what I wanted to do today.  The distinguishing difference, in case you are sniffing out parallels, is that no one is bankrolling this enterprise.)

THE WANING ERA OF THE STUDIO SYSTEM:  HOW DO THEY DEAL WITH THEIR RENEGADE FILMMAKERS?  (A FALSE PREMISE, AS DURING THE STUDIO SYSTEM, THERE WERE NO RENEGADE FILMMAKERS.  OH WELL.  NEVER LET FACTS TO INTERFERE WITH A PROMISING IDEA.)

INT. HEAD OF PRODUCTION’S OFFICE – DAY

The studio’s Head of Production holds the “Hail, Caesar!” script (with lot of page corners turned over) in his hand as the iconoclastic Coen Brothers whose movies make money – which is why they are tolerated – are ushered in to confer about it.

HEAD OF PRODUCTION:  Come on in, boys.  Astrid, hold my calls.

Astrid exits.  The Coen Brothers sit. 

HEAD OF PRODUCTION:  You got everything you need?  Water?  Coffee? 

The Coen Brothers exchange looks, shrugging “We’re fine.”

Okay.  (GESTURING TO THE “HAIL, CAESAR!” SCRIPT)  Great job.  As usual.  Looks like you had a lot of fun doing this.

The Coen Brothers remain comfortably silent.

Because it shows.  Great spirit.  Lotta laughs.  You gave away a few of our secrets here.  A little dirty laundry.  But we’re big boys.  We can weather the storm.

More comfortable silence emanating from the Coen Brothers.

I love this idea.  It’s flamboyant.  It’s original.  It’s fresh.  The guy’s confession:  “I hit a movie star in anger!”  Hilarious. 

A COEN BROTHER:  “Struck.”

What’s that?

THE OTHER COEN BROTHER:  “I struck a movie star in anger.”

Not “hit”. 

“Struck.”

“Struck”…

Is funnier.

Hey, you’re the writers.  Anyway, I love the script.  Could be your best yet.  But if you’ll indulge me, I have a few…

Looking back at him are two pair of affectless eyes, menacing though not detectably, which may even be more menacing.

I know.  You guys are artists.  You do things your way.  I accept that… because your movies make money.  I’m kidding.  We love you.  But you know how this works.  You are not obligated to change anything.  But you do have to listen.

The Coen Brothers sit silently.  They are – as contractually mandated – listening.

Okay.  A few things.  Not many.  Because it’s great.  Just a couple of ideas.  You know, I am actually pretty good at this.  I mean, the original version of… I won’t mention any names.  Needed a lotta work.  I’m not saying this does.  Not at all.  The point is, I was helpful. 

Polite disinterest from the Coen Brothers.

THE STUDIO HEAD TURNS TO A TURNED-OVER PAGE CORNER AT RANDOM.

The dance sequence.  A little too long?

No.

TURNING TO ANOTHER TURNED-OVER PAGE CORNER.

The kidnappers are Pinko screenwriters.  “Too smart for the room”, maybe?

We like that.

BUYING TIME, THE STUDIO HEAD FLIPS TO NUMEROUS TURNED-OVER PAGE CORNERS.

The various subplots.  They seem to just peter out.  The “Pregnant Actress” problem – it takes care of itself.  They find the kidnapped movie star – he’s sitting alone in the house.   And that “cowboy” kid – he falls right out of the picture.  Every situation we’re invested in – no resolution, no climax.
That’s exactly how we…

Imagined it. 

Anyone can tell stories.

We’re going for…

“Genre…

Ambiance”.

Well you definitely got that.

Thank you.

THE STUDIO HEAD SIGHS.

Lemme ask you something – general question.  Is there anything I could mention that you might actually… think about?

Like what? 

I am talking about the process.  Filmmaking is a collaborative business.

Of course. 

We are in this together, trying to make the best pictures we know how.  Everyone contributing.  Everyone doing their part.  You know what I mean?

A division of labor.

Ri…

We make the movies.

And you…

Pay for them.

It works beautifully, don’t you think?

ASTRID!

The Studio Head’s secretary bursts in.

Did I hear the phone ring?

Yes.  And I think you should take it.

Sorry, boys.  Big call.  Thanks for coming by.

They shake hands.  The Coen Brothers exit.

Was there really a call?

That Vice President from Lockheed.  He needs an answer about the job offer.

Tell him I’ll take it.  This business is getting too democratic.  Crazy filmmakers.  What will they want next?  A piece of the profits?

CUT TO:

EXT. STUDIO EXECUTIVE OFFICES – MOMENTS LATER.

The Coen brothers traverse the walkway back to their offices.

That wasn’t too bad.

Did you notice his mustache? 

That was all I was looking at.

Our next movie:  Mustaches.

I like it.

Me too.


THE BROTHERS RETURN CONTENTEDLY TO THEIR OFFICES, WAITING OUT THE STUDIO SYSTEM SO THEY CAN REALLY DO WHAT THEY WANT.

Friday, February 19, 2016

"Looking For Answers... Or Living Without Them"

“How did you get ‘Legionnaires’ Disease’?”

“I don’t know.”

Let us examine this concern as conclude this investigation, at least for now, though unlikely forever. 

“I don’t know” is, by my count, a terrible answer from three different perspectives.

First, although entirely accurate, “I don’t know” is not really an answer, the way that “Who is the queen of the Netherlands?”  “I don’t know” is not really an answer.  

That answer is entirely accurate as well.  I do not know who the queen of the Netherlands is.  I know that it used to be Queen Wilhelmina.  But that’s the answer to “Who used to be the queen of the Netherlands?” not who’s the queen of the Netherlands now, making me a historical smarty-pants but an ignoramus today. 

As an answer, “I don’t know”, as they say in football about a game that ends in a tie, is like kissing your sister.

You could fake an answer.  Asking the same question with an altered emphasis:

“How did you get ‘Legionnaires’ Disease?”  (because there were, at the time I contracted it, no reports of a general outbreak.)  To which I could facetiously reply, 

“I was personally selected for the privilege.”

As in,

“We have sufficient ‘Legionnaires’ Disease’ contaminant for only two nostrils.  Let’s shove it up Earl Pomerantz’s.”

But that’s a joke – a rueful, less than hilarious joke.  As with “I don’t know”, a responding joke can be viewed as a kind of a “punt.”  You are stuck for an actual answer, so you compensate by strategically kicking away the ball.  

“I don’t know.  Now you talk.”

“I don’t know” is the prototypically boring answer, unworthy of further dissemination.

TWO DINNER GUESTS SITTING ADJACENTLY.

“A friend of mine contracted ‘Legionnaires’ Disease.’”

“Oh really?  How did he get it?’

“He doesn’t know.”

THEY RETURN SILENTLY TO THEIR SOUP.

“I don’t know” – not informative and not interesting.  And now add to that list:

“Minimally reassuring.”

Since last August, this is the answer I have been required to live with.

“How did you get ‘Legionnaires’ Disease’?”

“Random happenstance.”  (The “high rent” version of “I don’t know.”)

That answer may be accurate, but where does it get me?  Or you, for that matter? Look out, people!  “Random happenstance” – Legionnaires’ Disease, or any other misfortune – can happen to anyone.

At any time.

Bringing to mind comedian Al Lubel’s joke about the “silent heart attack.” 

“A silent heart attack can hit you at any moment.  And you will never know you are having one.  I could be having a silent heart attack right now!  Or right now!  Or right now!  Or right now!”

“Random happenstance”.  Just.  Happens.  And hard as you try, there’s not a thing you can do about it.  I have this idea for a New Yorker cartoon.  A recent arrival, standing outside the “Pearly Gates”, turns St. Peter and he says,

“I did everything right… and I’m still dead.”

Feeling safe and comfortable in your personal living space?

How about the “George Costanza” direction for an answer?

“How did you get ‘Legionnaires’ Disease’?”

“God hates me!”

(In an episode of Seinfeld, George complains to his therapist that he fears that if ever has an enormous success, God will punish him with a proportionally terrible affliction.  The therapist replies, “I thought you didn’t believe in God.”  To which George fires back, “I do for the bad stuff.”)

It’s kind of egotistical to believe that out of six billion individuals on the planet, the Lord singles you out for Legionnaires’ Disease.  “God hates me!” is, however, an “answer”, meriting inclusion in our current investigation.

When you bring in the Deity, the conversation veers all over the place, spanning the spectrum from “God hates me” to “God’s plan is beyond all understanding”, a tenet of faith tested particularly when they are rushing your to the hospital and sticking I.V’s into you arm, informing you you have contracted a disease that got its name from wiping out handfuls of reveling Legionnaires in Philadelphia.
 
God may very well have a plan.  It just happens to involve taking me out!

Bringing us, finally, is the essence of this conundrum.

Which modality of reason do you identify with?

Let me be clear about this.  Everyone’s free to believe whatever they want. 

"Thank you."

You’re welcome.  Scientific certainty?  Fantastic.  “Random happenstance”?  So be it.  “The Lord works in mysterious ways”?  Knock yourself out.  Are they interchangeable as satisfying answers?  All can say is, that middle one – living without answers – offers interesting challenges. 

It’s not easy sleeping soundly on the uncertain pillow of “I don’t know.”

The thing is…


It’s all I’ve got.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

"Looking For Answers - The Middle Part (Although Don't Blame Me If There's No Third Part Because I Am Not Sure There Is One But We'll See, Isn't This Exciting?)"

Why do we need answers, by which I mean the correct answers? 

Let me quote the close-to-exact words from Neil Simon’s The Prisoner of Second Avenue (1975):

“They took out all my top teeth.  Then they found out it was kidney stones.”

That’s why we need answers.  If you don’t have them, you could unnecessarily lose all your top teeth.

That’s the “utilitarian” response to the question.  There is a paralleling interpretation coming up.  Probably.  I’m telling you, I am flying by the seat of my pants here!

From a practical standpoint, answers indicate directions to ameliorating solutions.

Wrong answers – to misquote “Amazing Grace”: 

“You once were lost, and that was it.”

Going seriously awry, following mistaken directions.  Explorers, looking for India and discovering Massachusetts.  (Those people were not “lost” exactly, but they were sure red-faced when they were asked, “What happened to the spices?”)

Moving on…

Consider the following alternatives:

Did you fall and break your hip?  Or did your hip break and you fell?

(I am referencing this example in case a misfortune of that nature occurs to me down the line and I am no longer writing this blog.  I not only do not waste things from the past.  I do not waste things from the future as well.)   

You might say concerning this example, “What difference does it make?  Either way, you’ve got a broken hip.”

True.  But the rival perceptions engenders disparate consequences. 

The consequence of “I fell and I broke you hip”?

You immediately look for somebody to sue. 

“The Department Store’s floor was too slippery?”

“There was an icy sidewalk in front of their house.”

“I slipped on some dog poop and they’ll be hearing from my lawyer!  And I am not talking about the dog!”

The consequences of “I broke my hip and I fell”?

Nothing. 

I mean, who are you going to sue, the hip maker?

An unfortunate happenstance, is what it is.  Your aging hip exceeded its “Expiration Date” and down you went.  Maybe if you’d taken calcium supplements, who knows?  You could sue your doctor for not instructing you to, I suppose.  But your attorney would most likely say, “Go home and enjoy your new hip.”

There you have it.  The same situation.  But, based on your choice of perspective, two diametrically different responses.  One, involving vituperative legal wrangling, the other, “I guess it just happened.”

On the other hand, there is another way of evaluating the story.

And that is…

As a story.

Let me tell you what I mean.

You know what’s an awful story – and by “awful” I mean unsatisfying?  This one happened to me.

“How did you get ‘Legionnaires’ Disease’”?

“I have no idea.”

Two sentences.  No excitement.  I have literally seen yawns.  And I understand why.  It’s a terrible story.  (Not to mention it offers no direction for avoiding “Legionnaires’ Disease” in the future.)

You can sense when a story – in the following case a visually delineated story – lacks an obligatory payoff.

In First Grade at the Toronto Hebrew Day School, we were asked to draw a picture involving a sporting activity.  I was incapable of drawing people.  So when Miss Sternberg, our art teacher, looked at my picture, what she saw on my drawing paper was this:  

A badminton net slung between two poles, and two rackets and the “birdie” lying on the ground.  “Where are the people?” inquired Miss Sternberg.  “It’s raining,” I replied.  “They went inside.”

Good answer.  Terrible drawing.

Although we definitely need answers as directions for amelioration, we also need answers for a sense of completion, or as they say in support of capital punishment, “closure.” 

It seems natural to want that.  Without completion – an outcome, a conclusion, an explanation – it’s like that joke I once heard involving the traditional song during the “Seventh Inning Stretch”. 

Try singing this:

Take me out to the ballgame take me
Out with the crowd buy me
Some peanuts and Cra-acker Jacks I don’t
Care if I ever get back for it's
Root root root for the home team if they
Don’t win it’s a shame for it’s
One two three
Strikes
You’re out
At the old ball game.

It feels weird, doesn’t it?  The song’s finished, but it isn’t.

There is this visceral requirement, I am arguing.  Events in our lives need to have satisfying resolutions.  Even if they’re wrong.  Or transparently fabricated.

I return to Neil Simon for another pretty-close-to-a-direct-quote, this time from the TV incarnation of The Sunshine Boys (1972), which could possibly have been a pilot.

Willy Clark is railing at the hotel desk clerk about some egregious grievance – the elevator door closed on his foot, or something, promising indisputable evidence of that occurrence:

“I have witnesses!” he angrily proclaims.  “They’re not here yet, but I have them.” 

Funny but preposterous?  Perhaps.

But consider,

“The Lord works in mysterious ways.”

It’s the same thing, isn’t it?  “There’s an answer.  It’s just not here yet.” 

And people believe that.

That’s how much we need answers. 


Tomorrow – having found my “tomorrow” – we shall examine how it feels living are without answers.