In a long-ago eon, CONPLAINIVUS has been bemoaning to a more
sanguine ACCEPTIVUS how, throughout history, it has taken the same length of
time getting anywhere, because people’s only method of transportation was
walking, at which point their resourceful friend INVENTIVUS comes racing by,
riding a horse.
ACCEPTIVUS:
Inventivus, look at you!
INVENTIVUS:
Ho, there, peasants. How goes the
walking?
COMPLAINIVUS:
I don’t understand. How did this
happen?
I: I shall explain. But first, let me stop my fast animal. Whoa, there, fast animal!
A: What does “whoa”
mean?
I: I have no
idea. But when I say it, he stops.
C: How did you figure
that out?
I: It’s this method I
employ. I attempt various
solutions. And when I find one that’s
effective, I’m there.
A: Fascinating.
C: It’s sort of a
trial-and-error approach.
I: “Trial and
error.” Did you just come up with that?
C: I did.
A: Complainivus is a
wonderful “namer.”
C: I can name ideas. I just can’t think of any.
INVENTIVUS ALIGHTS FROM HIS HORSE WITH A GROAN OF RELIEF.
I: You know, they’ve
got this big bone right down the middle.
I need to come up with something to make it more comfortable to sit
on. (TO COMPLAINIVUS) Perhaps you can invent a name for it.
C: A “saddle”, maybe?
I: You’re fast. Remind me when I work up the prototype.
A: So, Inventivus, we
were just discussing the idea of replacing walking with riding a fast
animal. But we were stymied by the
problem of catching one when, as their speed-describing name suggests, they are
impossible to apprehend, and hence , until the current moment, unavailable to
climb up on.
I: Yes, that was the
dilemma. But I cracked it by…(FORGETTING
THE TERM)
C: “Trial and error”?
I: Precisely. The first element in ”trial and error” – that
sounds better every time I hear it – is observation. By happenstance – another element often contributory to "game changers" – I happened to observe this fast animal munching leaves
from a tree in yon nearby grove. And I
thought to myself, “Hm. If I were to climb that tree, and the fast animal
were to subsequently return for another round of munching, I could drop down
from my perch, land on the animal’s back and – Hakus-Frakus! – (TO COMPLAINIVUS) I made that
up, but you can probably do better – I’m riding!
A: And it worked.
I: Not the first
time. I had made a strategic
miscalculation. The fast animal indeed
returned to the spot that had satisfied his hunger; however, since the fast
animal had consumed all the leaves it could reach on the previous visits, it moved on to an adjacent tree, and started
munching its leaves.
C: That’s a funny
picture. You’re sitting in one tree, ready to drop down onto its
back, and the fast animal’s dining “next door”, as it were, frustrating your
intention.
I: (POINTEDLY) “Trial
and error” involves error. And that
wasn’t the only one. I’d occupy a tree
where the leaves seemed appropriately reachable, and the fast animal would fail
to appear, or would appear, but
preferred, on that day, to eat grass. It
took weeks until “the necessities” were finally in alignment.
C: Sounds like you
have a lot of time on your hands.
I: I shall make up that time riding places, while you two continue to walk.
A: So you finally landed
on the fast animal’s back.
I: I did. And was almost immediately bucked off. It turns out fast animals, not unlike their human
counterparts, dislike the weighty encumbrance of the uninvited. Undaunted, however, I repeated the procedure and, since I
had refined my buck-resisting techniques in the course of my unsuccessful efforts, the infuriated
fast animal was unable to throw me off.
And now, my ambulatory amigos, I shall never walk anywhere again! (REMOUNTING)
By the way, Complainivus, do you have a name for my four-legged
companion?
C: Seabiscuit.
I: Why Seabiscuit?
C: It sounds like a
good name for a horse. I also named the
fast animal a horse.
I: Again, why?
C: He looks like a horse.
A: How do you know
it’s a “he”?
C: Have you looked down
below?
A: (LOOKING) Yikes!
INVENTIVUS IS READY TO RIDE.
I: Adios,
Pedestrians! I shall meet you at the
herd, where you will find me resting comfortably after my exertion-free journey. (URGING ON HIS HORSE) Giddy-up, Seabiscuit!
A: “Giddy-up”?
I: (SHRUGGING) It
makes him go.
INVENTICUS RACES AWAY.
COMPLAINIVUS AND ACCEPTIVUS CONTINUE DOWN THE TRIAL.
A: That Inventivus is
so resourceful. I could never have come up with that tree-jumping
plan.
C: I might have. But I’d have thought of a hundred reasons not
to do it.
A: Well, to the
innovator go the rewards. He’s riding,
and we’re hoofin’ it.
C: Yeah, but if he
doesn’t track down a similar beast of the opposite gender, the horse is dead,
and he’s walking with the rest of us.
A: (SARCASTIC) That’s a comforting thought.
C: It took a while,
but it came to me.
COMPLAINIVUS AND ACCEPTIVUS PROCEED ONWARD.
A: “Hi ho, hi ho…”
C: Stop it!
1 comment:
Dear Mr. Pomerantz; bravo!
-Z
Post a Comment