Bill Cosby – before his criminal difficulties, which, if it crossed
your mind I know nothing about – once described to me the imaginary template
behind his “stand-up” performances.
It was the image of a man at a table in a restaurant,
unspooling his anecdotes, to his companions’ rapt and rapturous attention.
He’s talking; they’re listening and responding
appropriately.
That’s pretty much what I’ve been trying to do here.
Not in a restaurant – restaurants are noisy and, inconveniently often, they bring the food to the table as
you are about to deliver the punchline.
(You know, that is the first time I ever typed the “punchline” – and
that’s the second time – where my
computer did not underline it in red.
It’s like my computer finally threw in the towel and they’re allowing me
make it one word. I just thought you
should know. The Human Beings finally prevailed!)
Instead of a restaurant, I
favored the image of sitting in a comfortable chair, telling people gathered
around me a story. That’s the stylistic
intention of this enterprise, combatting
the reality that we are actually in different places, my imaginatorial “telling”
deconstructing clunkily into me typing it now
and you reading it later.
I wanted to create that “stories around the campfire” feeling
in my writing.
Then I remembered Lenny Bruce.
And I remembered I couldn’t.
(Lenny Bruce is the “Patron Saint of Meaningful Comedy” – comedy
with a distinctive – dangerously provocative in his era – point of view.)
Many decades ago, I read two books about Lenny Bruce. One was his autobiography, How To Talk Dirty And Influence People,
the other, a compilation of his stand-up comedy routines, called The Essential Lenny Bruce.
The first book was extremely interesting. The second book – in which his “act” was
presented verbatim on paper – was
virtually unreadable – flat, frequently indecipherable and tediously unfunny.
The material was unedited; it was exactly what he performed onstage.
Except instead of being there, you get the transcribed version of what
he said.
It is not conceivably the same.
What exactly was missing?
Not the message, I suppose – it was there if you could extract the
nuggets from the extensive verbiage.
It’s just that… writing is not talking. (Or, more directly to the point, performing.)
Even if you want
it to be.
Imagine seeing Lenny Bruce “Live”, in a nightclub or a coffee
house. (Not that I ever saw him perform “Live” myself. The closest I came was a paralleling experience when, attending a Randy Newman concert, I
heard the explosive reaction when he warbled, “Short people have no reason… short people have no reason… short people
have no reason… to li-ive…”)
Maybe this is an obvious point, but some things are so
obvious you forget to consider them. Talking
to people, you have substantially more tools at your disposal than when you are
writing stuff for people to read. In the
other direction, an advantage to writing
is re-writing. For example, I just tightened that last
sentence. And I rewrote the one after it as well.
Can you imagine editing your material while you are
delivering it onstage?
“A man walks into a bar… I mean, a ‘swell’ – you don’t know the word ‘swell’ – a ‘distinguished
gentleman’ walks into… enters… an
establishment of alcoholic purveyances… no, just a bar… and he…
“Check, Please!”
You can change things when you’re writing. Which is a definite plus. (I just added “Which is a definite plus.”)
But here’s what you give up.
You lose the essential experience of “being there.” Where you get more than “just the words.”
You get immediacy.
You get personality. You get
passion. You get “eye contact.” You get hand gestures. You get “loud”, you get “quiet.” You get sweat, and possibly spittle. You get a real-in-the-room human being, communicating
selected content in the precise tone, timing and intensity they deliberately
intend.
Fat chance delivering that on paper.
You can try. (So I put “try” in italics to heighten the
emphasis.) You can simulate… timing (with
three dots, like I did there)… (and
there.)
You can accentuate the moment, giving it its own,
individualized line.,
Fragmenting the sentence,
Or marshaling clarifying.
Punctuation.
You can try any stunt you can think of.
But it’s still not “talking to you.”
(Full Disclosure:
In some ways, doing it this way is more consistent with my
personality. Right now, I am writing
barefoot, wearing gym pants and an unbuttoned ratty old shirt. Onstage, they would at least want you to wear
shoes. Overall, excluding rare exceptions,
I feel more relaxed communicating at a comfortable distance. Though harboring unexpressed notions of wanting
to do “stand-up”, this may, in fact, be a more compatible situation. I can say stuff. And you can hate it in a totally different
locale.)
Still – being me
and therefore wanting everything – I
regret the techniques unavailable to me.
Some writers agonize over the most evocative word or descriptive. (Of course, so do stand-up comedians, and, to
some degree, myself.) Fundamentally,
however, I look for the most natural – for me – way of connecting with strangers on
paper.
And I am still working on it.