Memo To The Curious Moviegoer:
Everything is subjective.
Except the previous statement, which is unshakably correct. Absolute Truth in religion – for those who
believe in it – that too. Everything else – totally up for grabs.
I “get” that movie reviews necessarily reflect the
subjective opinion of the reviewer. But
when reviewers’ opinions depart dramatically from my own… you know, when they
ran into my car at the Lexus
dealership, despite conclusive videoed evidence to the contrary, the
dealership’s manager adamantly denied his company’s responsibility for the
accident. When I continued pressing him
about it, he asked, “Why do you need me to admit it was our fault? To which I explanatorily replied,
“So I will not feel I am entirely crazy.”
It’s the same with reviews.
I see something; the reviewers see something. It’s not we disagree somewhat, it’s like we saw two entirely different movies. It is then I require a correcting “Reality
Check.”
Am I out my senses, or what?
Coast to coast, critics are raving about Korean filmmaker Bong Joon-ho's new feature release, Okja.
New York Times
reviewer A.O. Scott – “… wonderful new
film.”
L.A. Times Justin
Chang – “…thrilling…”
E. Raymond Pomerantz?
“I don't like it.”
You see how we’re not close?
Yes, there’s this adorable CGI animal that’s supposed to be a giant pig but looks more like a
soft hippopotamus. Who says you mutate a
pig and it turns suddenly gray and its traditional “pig-nose” becomes puppyish? That’s
not believable, is it? Still, it is cute
and you want one.
The visual interplay between Okja, the genetically modified
porker and the teenerish Mija – though I usually dislike CGI because it looks phonily stupid – is breathtaking, because this
time, it doesn’t.
The two physically roll around together – an actual person
and a computerized drawing – and it looks like they’re both real. (Assuming a real pig can be “supersized” and
turn gray.)
I enjoyed the gamboling “girl-pig” part a lot. But that’s all I enjoyed.
Here’s what you get, plot-wise.
An idyllic opening interlude between a serious-minded young girl
and her unusual-looking pet pig in a setting as perfectly pastoral as a
painting. The mercenary mega-company who
temporarily outsourced him – I think Okja’s
a “him” – to Mija’s caretaking grandfather return to retrieve the pig with plans
of submitting him to some nefarious undertakings – a genetically-modified pig
beauty contest, some obligatory mating and then, inevitable slaughter.
The resolute Mija bravely pursues the repossessed pig all
the way to New York, bent on returning Okja to the perfectly pastoral painting;
I mean, to what she and Okja collectively call “home.” Which is inherently the same thing. I just liked writing it that way.
The film begins naturalistically. Then the diabolical pig-murderers arrive, and
it’s “Crazy Town.”
What comprises the the rest of the movie is a “No Quarter”
cell of “Animal Rights” activists battling genocidal pig slaughterers. And nobody’s really that nice. Even the “Animal Rights” activists kick
people when they’re down. (And not at
all metaphorically.)
It’s like two movies in one – a sweetly sensitive “girl-and-her-pig”
movie – reminiscent of a kid-and-their-dolphin movie or an
Eskimo-kid-and-their-sled-dog movie – and a live-action “Splatter” cartoon. Leaving you questioning whether the mutated pig is drawn and the people are real, or is it the other way
around? From a behavioral standpoint,
the CGI pig is more inherently
credible. Do you see how unsatisfying
that is?
The reviewers? They
loved it.
“A miracle of
imagination and technique.”
“A marvel of
contemporary technical wizardry and old-fashioned cuddliness.”
Me? “No sale.” And nowhere nearing “a close call.” Good
thing I’m not a film critic.
“Ugly!”
“Amoral!”
“A Narrative Train
Wreck!”
Not good for the posters.
We walked up there (to the movie theater) because of the hyper-positive
review, discovering to our leg-weary chagrin that our selected “show time” was
sold out. Who says newspaper film
critics have no palpable effect? How
else would you explain the surprise sellout?
Barring some unheralded coterie of Bong Joon-ho devotees living in Santa Monica.
We walk back the following evening – having ordered tickets
on-line, in case the groundswell of Okja-mania
had not entirely subsided. We get in…
… and very quickly, we sincerely wish that we hadn’t.
My own personal opinion:
Do not see Okja.
Unless you’re a sucker for questionably conceived cyber-pigs.
Or unless the reviewers are right, and my concurring
filmgoing companion and myself are totally bonkers.
You see how “subjective” works?
Personally truthful.
But, practically,
No help at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment