Ignorance.
(If you’re in a hurry, you can go now, because that’s pretty
much all I’ve got to say.)
I was thinking about this during the recent “Spring Forward”
time change. I have a CD clock-radio
that wakes me up every morning (to the energizing welcome of the old Hockey Night In Canada theme music my
friend Paul gave me.) When the time
change comes, I reflexively tense up, because I have no idea how to adjust the
clock. The thing came with instructions,
but after fifteen years, I think they disintegrated. Either that, or a candy got stuck on them,
and I threw them away.
After hours of frustrating effort – actually ten minutes,
but it felt like hours – I discovered
this wonderful thing. There’s a button
on the side of the clock-radio marked “Summer.”
You press that button, and the clock instantly jumps to an hour later. (I am still looking for the “Fall” button.)
To me, this is magic.
A little silver button that knows when it’s March. Equally – no, even more – amazing is my cell phone, which is the old “flip” type of
phone. I believe it’s the model Thomas
Edison used. (That’s how old it is, you
see.)
My phone displays the time in a little window. I happened to notice it on “Time Change” Day,
and, if I were chewing gum at that moment, I would have swallowed it. My cell phone – passé as it is – had changed
the time to an hour later…
All by itself!
You didn’t have to do anything. The phone said, “I got it!”, and it changed
the time without any human participation whatsoever. Other than, of course, the human, or team of
humans, who originally programmed the thing to do that!
Which brings me to my point.
The people who made the phone “Time Change” itself, as well as the people who made it so I can press “Summer”
and my clock-radio jumps ahead – those people are smart. I, on the other hand, am ignorant.
I know some things
– like who the tandem of Maple Leaf
goalies were who won the 1967 Stanley Cup
– Johnny Bower and Terry Sawchuck – but I do not know clock adjustment.
The source of my wonder over these miraculous gadgets I own is
this ignorance, from the Latin ignoscere,
meaning “to not know.” (The opposite is cognoscere, meaning “to know”, which it
the root of the English word “cognition”, and, if you “know” more than once, “recognition. “ Okay, so I cognosco a little Latin too.)
My circuitous message here is, that among the numerous
generators of comedy – one arrow in the comedic quiver, if you will – is
unquestionably
Ignorance.
Ignorance is a bountiful source of comedic
exploitation. It’s everywhere. Situational misunderstandings. Mistaken identities. “Inadvertent” malapropisms. Or simply, not knowing something, and getting
things hilariously wrong.
Think of sitcoms of the past where characters seemed innocently
unaware of factual reality. Taxi had two them, the Andy Kaufman and
the Tony Danza characters, one of whose “not quite up to speed” sensibility was
explained by the fact that he was “a foreigner”, and the other, a journeyman boxer,
beaten into literal “insensibility” by having been continually pummeled in the
cranial area.
(Writers like to have rationales when their characters are
less than conventionally knowledgeable, because otherwise, they are simply
“writing stupid.”)
I hesitate to anoint knowledge the all-time “enemy of
comedy”, but sometimes, it is. I recall a friend who, after an assertion of
ignorance on my part intended for comedic effect, would propose a solution to
my ignorance, the result of which would make me significantly informed on the
matter, but the trade-off would be that I lost a joke. (When that happens habitually, one has to seriously
weigh the price of retaining that person as a friend.)
Ignorance in comedy is tricky. You have to be just “ignorant enough.” Here are two examples from the late iconic British
comedian Tommy Cooper’s Secret Joke File
book. One of them reflects too much
ignorance, the other, just the right amount.
"When I complained my ears hurt, the air hostess gave me some
chewing gum. I’m still trying to get it
out of my ears!"
"My little boy asked me how you can tell a boy fish from a
girl fish. I said, 'It’s all in the
worms you to catch them with. If you
bait your hook with a male worm, you catch a female fish, and if you use a
female worm, you catch a male fish.' He
said, 'How can you tell the difference between a male worm and a female worm? I said, “How should I know? I only know about fish.'"
Some people might find those two jokes equally ignorant. But they can probably tell a boy fish from a
girl fish, and I can’t. That’s another
destroyer of comedy, when your audience possesses knowledge you don’t, or at
least pretend you don’t. I’m telling you, if you’re not careful, this
“knowledge thing” can bring down comedy like the proverbial “House of Cards.”
Of course, there is also the comedic risk of knowing
something your audience doesn’t.
But, for some reason, I don’t really worry about that.
1 comment:
Some of us might argue that there's a difference between life and comedy, and that ignorance is not required to best enjoy the former. In fact, some of us prefer knowing things. But rather than explain how your phone switched to Daylight Saving Time, I shall instead defer to your choice.
Post a Comment