An incandescent
comedic image, once seen, is never forgotten.
At least not by me.
A couple of posts back, I recounted for your enjoyment an
unforgettable picture gracing the cover of a children’s book from my rapidly
receding childhood. This reminded me of
a similar epiphany concerning another
visual that drove me into paroxysms of rapturous reverie and awe-stricken
wonderment. (Or something less flowery.)
I have written about this before. Rather than retelling it, I would link you to
that earlier post. If I knew how to
link, which, embarrassingly, I do not.
(Though I can embed Youtube
videos, which is ostensibly more difficult, so go figure.) People have shown how to link, but it doesn’t
seem to stick. “Woe to the accurse-ed
who dwelleth in the techno-world beyond his own understanding.” (Ezekiel
–2:… No, I’m making it up.)
Unable to reproduce it, I shall retell the story, in hopes
that those who have already heard it did not feel it was worth remembering and
will as a result find it new and perhaps not worth remembering a second time opening
the door to a yet third retelling
down the line.
“Indifference is the Mother of repetition.”
“Bartlett’s”
called. Not even close.
Thank you.
The fact is, even if I did
know how to link, doing so would require my recalling the title of the relevant
post in question. Which, once again –
embarrassingly – I do not. Falling
victim to my sitcom writing indoctrination, where the show runners I worked for
insisted upon ingenious “play-on-words” episode titles that the audience would never
see because they were only written on the covers of the scripts for the
edification of I don’t know who – the set decorators? They
didn’t care. – I have outsmarted myself by entitling many of my blog posts in
such a “too clever by half” manner, that I am now unable to decipher what they
mean, leaving me totally in the dark as to what the blog posts beneath those
indecipherable titles are about.
Aren’t I the crafty one?
This brings to mind the great W.C. Fields who, having grown
up in poverty, once wealthy, opened numerous bank accounts throughout the
country, so that, wherever he was, he would always have money. Unfortunately, instead of registering them in
his own name, Fields opened the hundreds of cross-country accounts using fictitious
monikers, such as “Ludovic Fishpond” and “Cholmonley Frampton-Blythe”, names he
was, subsequently, unable to remember.
Not dissimilar to my post-title debacle. I find it encouraging to have made the same
mistake as a genius. It gives me a
somewhat twisted sense of elevation.
Okay, so here we go again.
The memorable image was discovered in a Woody Woodpecker
comic book when I was twelve. I believe
it was at camp at the time, as I recall that the comic book’s pages were
damp. Everything at camp was damp.
You picked up a piece of Kleenex,
and it felt already blown into.
What stays with me from that comic book were three
consecutive panels, escalating to a sublime comedic payoff.
The situation is, Woody Woodpecker is skiing uncontrollably
down a hill. (This is already a fantasy,
because woodpeckers traditionally do not ski.
Wood skis? They’d just eat them.)
The first panel – “The Setup”, if you will – shows Woody
Woodpecker, finding himself careening towards a giant tree directly in his path.
The second panel – call it the “Calamitous Expectation” – is
a close-up of Woody’s Woodpecker’s face, his panic-dilated eyes anticipating
the inevitable – unquestionably life-ending –
“Splat!”
The third and final panel – “The Resolution” – shows Woody
Woodpecker, stopped further down the hill, looking upward, and seeing, tracked
in the snow, one ski tread arcing around the tree on one side, and the other
ski tread arcing around tree on the other.
His reaction is stupifying incredulity, as in,
“What???????”
Woody Woodpecker has been spared by a comic book writer’s
imagination. He seems to have safely skied right
through a tree!
I could not take my eyes off that third panel. Once again, I am thinking, perhaps as only a
future writer would,
“How did they ever think that up?”
Like a trailblazing scientist, somebody relegated Reality to
the bench, and made an innovative leap, yielding a transformational
breakthrough that had never existed before.
When executed successfully, such scientists are prominent contenders for
the Nobel Prize.
If there were a Nobel
Prize for comic book writing – and if it were my call, there would be – the mind behind of that “out-of-the-box” comedic
triptych deserves serious consideration for Stockholm’s preeminent honor.
Walter Lantz (Woody Woodpecker’s creator) – Einstein
welcomes you to the club!
I submit this, from 1940: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/8997927/Charles-Addams-Master-of-black-humour.html
ReplyDelete