Surveying my TV viewing habits, when I am not watching
sports, the Westerns Channel, cable
news or old movies, I generally watch dramas, partly because today’s comedies rarely
tickle my funny bone, and partly because I’m not doing any of them. (Which is fine, because if the people doing
those shows truly find them funny, I would, practically, not be able to help
them.)
The two dramas I watch the most are Law & Order – the original – and SVU, though I have serious reservations about SVU, especially when they make child actors reenact rape scenarios:
“He made me touch him…‘down there.’”
I don’t know how a parent submits little children to that
kind of…blechhhh!
They’re children!
Anyway I have deviated from my point. (And how often does that happen?) Allow me to
work my way back. In stages. No disruptifying leaps.
These are the rules for dramas I will never watch. I will never watch a drama if it’s a continuing
story demanding regular attendance (so no Homeland
for me.) Or if it abandons its
conceptual premise and morphs into a soap opera; one adulterous kiss, and I am
outta there. (I have not seen The Good Wife in years. It used
to be a lawyer show.)
(Bear with me, I’m almost home, “home” being why I decided
to write this post.)
When you throw in all the cable series, what amazes me most about
TV dramas is that, together, every season, they come up with hundreds of
original, generally engrossing story ideas.
This makes me wonder, “Where do these hundreds of original, generally
engrossing story ideas come from?”
And now, a sidetrack.
(Or is it?)
I saw a cable rerun of an SVU episode once – probably more
than once, I watch them over and over, forgetting, not that I’ve already seen them, I remember that. What I’ve forgotten is
how they turned out. I can watch a Law & Order episode multiple times,
because I have no recollection whatsoever of the ending.
In this particular episode, a murder victim – they were probably
also sexually victimized because it’s SVU
(“Special Victims Unit”, “special” meaning you were sexually victimized – the
cadaver is autopsied, and they discover somewhere on the body the DNA of a dead
fraternal twin.
The live fraternal
twin – a female – is eliminated as a suspect, because fraternal twins do not
have the same DNA.
Howevah…
An intense investigation reveals – Get this! – that as newborns, the two siblings had, in fact, been identical twins, but, as a result of a
botched operation “down there”, the surviving
twin, originally born a boy, had been surgically reconstructed into a female. Meaning that the surviving sibling (who, by
the way, had no idea they had been born a male) would have the same DNA as their deceased sibling, and could
therefore have been – and indeed turned out to be – the murderer.
Be honest, now. Who
of us saw that coming?
Okay, they can’t all be gems. The show’s been on fourteen years; this was
clearly one of their later episodes. All
of this, however, begs the question, the question being, “How did they ever
come up with that?”
Months later, I get a call from my daughter Anna, who is also an SVU watcher, and who had seen that episode. She says, “Dad, my friend Lizzie just told me
she read about a doctor in Florida who was arrested for botching a circumcision
of twins, which he covered up by turning the botched twin into a girl.”
Mystery solved: One
source – possibly the primary source
– of stories for dramas is actual life, that somebody wrote about and someone
on the show’s writing staff discovered. (Mystery
Number Two: It was not a later SVU episode, it was an earlier
one. Anna knew that because of Olivia’s
hairstyle.)
My confusion about where dramas get their stories emanates
from my experience in comedy. For sitcom
series, coming up with stories is an entirely different process, an “in-house”
rather than an external one.
The majority of sitcom storylines derive, not from researchable material in the
public domain, but from personal experience (every story on my series Family Man happened to me, either as a
child, or as an adult), the regulars’ character traits (Kramer’s struggles with
compulsive gambling), the unique arena of the series (Best of the West drew storylines from classic westerns, and its
frontier locale) or from tried-and-true sitcom perennials (your best friend’s
place is being fumigated, so they temporarily move in with with you.)
I once developed an episode out of a writer on the staff’s
hobby of playing “chess by mail” (this was before the Internet) his opponent, a
chess player he had never met. I lucked
out on that one. I turned a colleague’s
experience into an interesting comedy episode I had never seen before. On the other hand, having a writer on your
staff who’d been born an identical male twin but had been turned into a female
following a botched circumcision?
That’s just too much to hope for.
And I’m not sure it’s funny.
Hi there!
ReplyDeleteI recently discovered your blog and enjoyed a lot your articles and thoughts! love the ones that show reality with an acid sense of humor!
I was wondering if you would be interested in sharing your posts and ideas on Glipho? I bet that our users would love to read your amazing stuff! It's a quite new social publishing platform, really easy to use it and communicate with your followers.
In additional, you are able to import the posts from your blog in a super-easy way without affecting it at all.
Please, have a look and take a tour to know more about http://glipho.com/. If you would like to set up your account, please do not hesitate to ask me for further information and I will send you an invitation.
I hope you will join our Glihpo community soon. :)
All the best,
Maite