A lot of blogs are popular because of their helpful tips. Today, I shall follow in those blogs’ footsteps. The best way I can.
I shall tell you how I
did things, my helpful tip being, “You see what I did there? Study it in detail. Then, do it a different way.”
Spread the word. This
blog is educational!
If you do things differently than I did, you’ll be doing
things – if not right – then at least righter
than I did them. This “Avoid my approach at all costs” strategy
is guaranteed to help you do better work, reduce stress and aggravation, and
allow to get home in time to see your children before they’re asleep. Or have gone off to college.
Last time, I talked about “Page-One Rewrites”, involving
scripts that, during “Production Week”, were discovered to be in such atrocious
shape they required a massive amount of rewriting, from Page One to the end,
hence the panic-inducing moniker, “Page-One Rewrite.”
This was hopefully a rare situation. However, when I ran shows…
Every script was a
“Page-One Rewrite.”
Let me qualify that remark before they come over and take
back my awards. It wasn’t that every
script we prepared for production turned out to be in terrible shape. The majority of them were in pretty good shape. The actors read them at the table, the laughs
were plentiful, and the story essentially made sense. There would inevitably be the necessary “trims”
to bring the episode to time, minor content clarifications and a handful of
joke misfires in need of replacement.
But that was it.
Nevertheless, on every rewrite during “Production Week”,
from the first rewrite after the “Table Reading” to the rewrites after the
runthroughs (of which there were generally two), when I ran the room, we would
always begin our revisions starting on Page One. I would then dutifully call out the succeeding
page numbers and, if there was a “trouble spot”, we would stop there and do
what needed to be done.
Sometimes, believing they had an upgrade, a writer would
pitch an alternate joke, even though
the joke currently in the script had gotten a solid laugh. We would then take time to debate which joke
was funnier. Being now in “pitching
mode”, other writers would jump in with alternates for the alternate. The “winning
joke” would then be inserted – or the original
one left alone – and on we would go.
There would also be times when a joke that got a laugh
earlier stopped getting a laugh – because,
through repetition, the joke’s “funny” had eventually worn off – and we would
irrationally take the time – up to an hour in some excruciating cases – to
pitch a replacement joke. I say
“irrationally” because the audience
would only hear the original, previously funny
joke,
Once.
Then, of course, there were the serious script problems,
involving a scene that required a “start from scratch” reworking. More often than not, this “trouble scene” was
the climactic scenes at the end of the episode.
Our rewrite would begin with a discussion of that scene, a task which
might eventually involve creating an entirely new outline.
After it was decided how to revise that climactic scene, if I ran the room, we would then return to
Page One, and away we would go. Working
our way through the script. Line by
line. Joke by joke.
But Earlo, if the
major problem was at the end of the script, why not tackle it first, when
you’re fresh and focused and full of beans, and then start back at Page
One, cleaning up the “little stuff” along the way.
Really? You think
that’s a better approach?
Duh!
I know that’s a better
approach! What am I, crazy?
Then why didn’t you do
it that way?
Because I had to begin at Page One!!!
I am certain there were show runners who worked on the
hardest stuff first. Aside from the fact
that my congenital linearity made me temperamentally incapable of not
starting on Page One, there were logical reasons for the way I did things. But all of them were weak. Still, as a nostalgic tip of the hat to my
inflexibility and dumbness, I shall respectfully allot them the following
paragraph:
Sometimes, to accommodate the revamped ending, certain
structural underpinnings earlier in the script needed to be revisited, and I
wanted to remember to attend to those adjustments. Also, though the hardest work – which could take
a number of hours to complete – was behind us, there was something, for me, psychologically
discouraging about going back to Page One at a depressingly later hour.
Most importantly, however, I was an idiot. And we shall leave it at that.
(Additional Parenthetical Excuse: The people who taught me always started on Page One.
But retrospectively? So what?)
Anyway, there you have it, your helpful tip for today. There are two ways of handling a rewrite – my way, and the right way.
Man!
If I only hadn’t been me.
I do a fair amount of writing at work, which is reviewed by countless hordes of people who provide their own helpful suggestions, and I have to start me "rewrites" from page one as well.
ReplyDeleteI also have to have the punctuation right or I get so distracted by the misused semi-colon or the lack of an Oxford comma that I can't focus on the content.
You're not alone in the "doin' it wrong" club.
I think sometimes it's better to start on page one, with lines that can be adjusted, and are fixable, so that everyone feels good about themselves, knows they're making progress, and thus are in a better mood to tackle that big problem later in the script.
ReplyDelete