If you want to see a picture (actually two pictures) of me
wearing a really nice shirt, check out the most recent issue of Written By, the official magazine of the
Writers’ Guild of America West (there is also a Writers’ Guild East, which, for some reason is
separate). The issues includes an
article about mentors, in which I am prominently featured. I am unable to vouch for the article, as severe
character flaws prevent me from reading it.
But I cannot speak highly enough about the shirt.
What I did read in
Written By, which is an entertaining
and informative magazine – and only marginally “Rah! Rah! For Writers!” – was
an interview with writer/actress Zoe Kazan, whose movie Ruby Sparks (which she wrote and stars in) will be coming out this
summer.
The name Kazan is readily recognizable. Zoe’s Zadey (grandfather) was Oscar-winning film director Elia Kazan –
A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), On The Waterfront (1954). Zoe’s parents are also in the movie business.
Her Dad, Nicholas wrote, among other screenplays, Reversal of Fortune (1990). Her mother, Robin Swicord wrote, among other
screenplays, Memoirs of a Geisha
(2005). And together, they co-wrote the
movie Matilda (1996).
Zoe Kazan would seem to easily qualify as a member of what I
once heard a barely-scraping-by actress call “The F-in’-Lucky Club.” A young woman, (still in her twenties)
descendant of a multi-generational show biz-“connected” family – how could she
fail? The “Secret Of Her Success?” She was “f-in’ lucky” to have been born into
the right family.
Envious people say mean things. With no evidence beyond Zoe’s last name, they
immediately imagine an undeserving “no-talent” making it entirely on “family
coattails.” Bitter people need to believe such things. How else to explain their own failure?
Okay, let’s get serious here.
Webster’s
Dictionary:
nepotism (n.)
patronage or favoritism based on family relationship.
“‘Connected’ people have definite advantages.” Is that true?
Does nepotism increase one’s chances of “making it in the biz”? In general, it does.
How?
The most obvious way is that nepotism opens doors.
“Margorie Shmeplap’s daughter has written a screenplay. Do you think we should check it out?”
“Who’s Margorie Schmedlap?”
“Elia Kazan’s granddaughter, whose parents are Nicholas
Kazan and Robin Swicord, has written a screenplay. Do you think we should check it out?”
“Absolutely!”
Why, “Absolutely!”?
They are betting on bloodlines.
Which I shall return to in a moment.
They are also more likely to
check out Zoe’s screenplay, because her family knows, or at least can more
easily gain access to, the person who
said “Absolutely!”
“The impossible” is less so when you’re “connected.” It’s not easy getting an agent. But if your parents already have one,
“getting an agent” as easy as calling them on the phone.
Let us now return to “bloodlines.” Bloodlines are real. Ask any racehorse owner
who paid top dollar for a Kentucky Derby
winner’s semen.
In all sports, it
is noteworthy how many offspring of former players are also involved in the
game, at the highest, most competitive levels.
Are you telling me genetics had nothing to do with that?
I will return shortly with an exception. But I’m building an argument here, and I want
to remain on track.
The third advantage of “nepotism” relates to “being around
the thing you’re aspiring to do.”
This one is huge.
Example One: You’re
in Toronto; you have no available role models:
Your dream of being a Hollywood writer appears entirely
unrealistic.
Example Two: You’re
in Hollywood; your parents are both writers:
It’s like,
“My parents do
it. What’s the big deal?”
When you are proceeding in a vacuum, staring down a long, untraveled
road, one of the toughest issues is believing you can do it.
When your parents
are doing it – they’re not special,
they’re Mom and Dad, and they do it every day – there is no a reason to believe
you can’t.
So, “connections”, genetics, and “my parents and all their
friends are in show business, there’s nothing to it” – three undeniable
advantages of nepotism. The challenging
thing about having a show business background is often wanting to be something else.
“A pharmacist? Why?”
Okay.
When I was part owner of an “A-ball” baseball team – the
absolute basement level of professional baseball – we had, for a time, a third
baseman named Pete Rose Jr. Baseball
fans will immediately recognize the name.
Pete Jr.’s Dad, also named
Pete, got more hits during his career than any player in baseball history. (The only reason he is not in the Hall of Fame is because he was caught
betting on games – including games he was involved in – and was banned from the
sport for life.)
Pete Rose Jr. was what is called a “journeyman”
ballplayer. And not one of the better ones. A perennial minor leaguer, Pete Jr. did advance to the Major Leagues. Pete’s father played in a record-setting
3,562 games. Pete Jr. played in
fourteen.
My ultimate point is this:
There’s a song in the musical Fiorello called “Politics and Poker.” Identifying the indispensible ingredient for success
in both politics and poker, the closing verse explains,
“In poker and politics
Brother,
You’ve gotta have
That slippery
hap-hazarous
commodity,
You’ve gotta have
the cards.”
Nepotism definitely greases the wheels. But you are ultimately going nowhere, Brother
– or Sister –
If you haven’t got the cards.
Dear Mr. Pomerantz; it's not so much the nepotees having a hand, it's, "is their hand better than the nobodies?" Given the product of Hollywood it's not hard for nobodies everywher to think that if it weren't for all the somebodies and their relations jamming up the pipe they'd be there making better things.
ReplyDeleteNobodily yours,
-Z
Nepotism is favoritism granted to relatives regardless of merit.[1] The word nepotism is from the Latin word nepos, nepotis (m. "nephew"), from which modern Romanian nepot and Italian nipote and Catalan nebot, "nephew" or "grandchild" are also descended.
ReplyDeleteBest regards,
Damian
Nepotism gained its name after the church practice in the Middle Ages, when some Catholic popes and bishops, who had taken vows of chastity, and therefore usually had no children of their own, gave their nephews such positions of preference as were often accorded by fathers to son.
ReplyDeleteSeveral popes elevated nephews and other relatives to the cardinalate. Often, such appointments were a means of continuing a papal "dynasty".
Regards,
Steven