A speculative
question, since, being no longer involved, I do not personally know. But having heard about it from others, I offer
this hearsay assessment.
Now that the networks own their own shows, the interference,
which I have been told is ubiquitous, is no longer “meddling.” It is your boss telling you, “Do it.”
The difference between “Now, and then” is delineated in this
story, as experienced by yours truly, before networks owned their own shows and
had unchallengeable control.
Here was the deal back then, which everyone knew going in.
We knew that, since networks did not own the shows, they could not tell us to do anything. We, however, also knew these were the same people
who’d decide if our show made their upcoming schedule, or was permanently designated
to “Nowheresville.”
A screaming inducement to do what they wanted, but still.
You don’t have to do what they
wanted. But if you don’t, your show is
destined for “Nowheresville.” Which, if no
other network picked it up, is the echoing “End of the Line.”
“”Hello-o-o-o-o? Can
anyone see us?”
“No-o-o-o-o-o.”
Okay, so there’s that.
We had freedom, if not ultimate control.
Cut To: Major Dad. (My personalized example of how things once
worked.)
Major Dad is a show
I am attached to because its creators lack sitcom experience. I have agreed to that attachment. No pressure.
If I had said, “No”, it would have been “No.” (Note: You can only say “No” so many times before
your studio “Development Deal” goes “Bye-bye”, along with subsidized naps on
your comfortable office couch.)
I could tell you stuff here.
I could tell you how ABC
where we pitched the original idea – “A widowed Marine father with three
children” – laughed us out of the building.
(After that meeting, ABC’s “V.P.
of Development”, knowing it was not my idea, called and asked, “Is he kidding
with this thing?”, “he” being the show’s co-creator, and series star, if it
went.)
I could tell you that CBS
where we went next – and, at the suggestion of a CBS executive, to whom I owe appreciation and gratitude, the
premise was changed to “a Marine marries a woman with three daughters” – agreed
to bankroll the pilot.
I could tell you how they resisted my pilot story idea – a
surprise marriage proposal in the show’s opening episode. (They wanted a more typical episode,
conventionally called “Episode Six.” I
explained to them that in order to sell them the series I had to do my best
story idea, and that “surprise marriage proposal” was it.)
What I am saying is: Major Dad as a series?
A gynormous long shot, right from the beginning.
Such is the context for the tale I am about to impart.
One of the perks of having a star/slash/executive producer
is their active participation in the casting process, a big help, revealing how
– or if – the co-starring couple will mesh.
After a lengthy winnowing-down process, the star came in, reading the
“audition scene” with the contenders for the show’s “Female Lead” role
The reading with the show’s eventual winner sent sparks of “great
chemistry” flying around the room. Not
the biggest of names, nor a great track record in comedy, but “Hands down” – whatever
that means; shouldn’t it actually be “Hands up”? – she was the right person for
the part.
And everyone, including my financial partners, Universal Studios, unanimously – which
is redundant since I already said “everyone” but I retain it for emphasis –
agreed.
I now jump to the last runthrough before Major Dad would be filmed in front of a
live studio audience, a final tune-up before the dice-rolling “Big Night.”
The final runthrough went smoothly. Not great – the actors “saving themselves”
for the actual show – but well enough to think we were in confidently good
shape.
Watching that runthrough from the bleachers was CBS’s then “President of Television.” (I can hear hissing in my head.) When the runthrough was over, rather than a
boostering, “Looks good, guys. See you
tomorrow”, we instead heard,
“I can’t tell you what to do. But if I were you, I would close down
production, and recast the “Female Lead.”
“Thud!” went our sensitive spirits. And our slim chances of making the
schedule. (Which this guy determined!)
Here’s how I maturely handled his suggestion.
I got up from the bleachers and went down to the stage,
plopping myself onto the “living-room set” couch, stubbornly refusing to
participate further. At the urging behest
of my Universal Studios business partners,
I finally relented, my returning rebuttal being, “We’re done.” Meaning, “We have made our decisions, and we are
ready to proceed.”
The next night, the filming went more spectacularly than we could
have possibly imagined. Major Dad made the CBS schedule, running successfully for four seasons.
Now – and by contrast –
Today, with the controlling marbles in the hands of the
networks, the CBS president would
have fired the “Female Lead” on the spot.
In fact, he’d have stopped us from hiring her in the first place, when
we brought in three “preferred candidates”, as shows were required to do at the
time.
Then, after firing the “Female Lead”, the CBS president would have certainly fired
me.
In fact, I’d have been canned earlier, fighting for my unusual pilot
story idea.
NETWORK EXECUTIVE: “No.
And good-bye.”
The Result: Major Dad suffers the consequences, and
we do not have a swimming pool in our backyard.
Or perhaps even a backyard.
That’s the difference.
Back then, they could make your life miserable, with their clueless “sidelines
suggestions.” But in the end, you could
do what you wanted.
Today, everyone would be gone.
Do we miss anything with this unbalanced arrangement?
I don’t know.
(Because you can’t miss what you don’t see.)
But from what the networks are offering,
I am guessing a lot.
This reminds me of something I've seen in places I have worked. There are situations where people are managers and seem to think that they are supposed to know everything. They feel that since they've been put in charge of the people they manage, they must know more than those people. So, they will start to tell the people they manage how to do their jobs. This can lead to micromanagement, bad decisions and people who quit in frustration.
ReplyDeleteThe people in charge need to understand that they do not know everything and probably don't know more than the people they manage. The people in charge need to understand that they may have been put in charge because no one else wanted that job. There are a lot of people who would rather get work done and do it correctly than spend their time managing people.
They best managers I have had are the ones who respect my expertise in certain areas and know there are other people in the group who have expertise in a different area. The best managers act as facilitators who take on the paper work and fend off the upper managers to allow their people to get the work done.
I'd be interested in hearing your stories about good studio executives who helped rather than hurt your efforts at trying to make the best show you could. Surely there were some of those :-)
Great post, Earl. Chilling. Infuriating. Satisfying in terms of your not having to listen to that naysayer. And spot on in terms of where things are today and how shows suffer as a result.
ReplyDelete