Following a post called “State Of The Blog Interlude”, published
January 24th but written a week or so earlier, I received four
comments. Which, for me, is a ton.
I thought something serious had happened to me.
Among that avalanche of comments was one from regular
visitor JED, which read, in part,
“Your readers do ask
questions from time to time but I think you’re writing your posts well ahead of
when they are published so answering a question that is days or weeks old
doesn’t make sense.”
My reaction is,
“Hm.”
“Hm.”
And “Hm”, again.
“Answering questions that are days or weeks old doesn’t make
sense.”
Why not?
I doubt if responding sooner would have altered the answer. I’m just not that kind of a guy. And if the question’s worth answering, I say the answer’s worth waiting for. Come on, now! It’s me!
As I recall, many commenter questions have evolved into
entire posts. Not necessarily right
away, but that’s either because I did not immediately notice the question, or it
took time to fashion a suitable answer, or, as JED sensibly suggests, I had
completed posts already scheduled to be published, or, jumping back, I was not
sure why the now fully considered answer couldn’t wait.
(Can you do “either-or” with four alternatives? Can you say “alternatives” when there are
more than two? I seem to recall you
can’t. Oh, well. This is casual conversation, so I’m doing it.)
Let me clarify the first explanation, not as a defense –
well, maybe a little bit as a defense – but as more of a demystifying “Now you
know.”
Until recently, all reader comments were automatically
transmitted to my e-mail, so when I
checked my e-mail, I could immediately see the comments. (Accompanied by the word I misread as “Noreplay”, which a correcting family
member later explained to me meant “No Reply.”)
Now that “Reader Comments” only appear at the end of the
posts, I have to click on “View Blog”, in order to access them. And I frequently forget. (Like I look at my compartmentalized “Pill
Case” on Thursday and see I forgot to take them on Wednesday.)
Now that I think of it, I never hosted a specific “Question
Day”, offering a list of questions and my abbreviated answers in a single
post. Why not? Because I don’t get enough questions. And when I get one I can sink my teeth into,
I make it an entire post.
(Ken Levine traditional does “Friday Questions” on his
wonderful blog (bykenlevine.com). I recently thought of parodying that
tradition, borrowing actual questions from Ken’s blog, and answering them, in
turn, “I don’t know” and “I don’t remember.” Wisely, I believe, I decided
against it.)
Let me hereby assert that every question deserves an
answer. The thing is, sometimes, I don’t
have one. Or I do, but it’s not
interesting. Plus, offering a brief
answer to an individual question would not fill a entire post. It would only be “sample-sized.”
Now… as to “writing ahead”.
Generating the distancing “disconnect” caused by “writing ahead” but, as
for the subsequent comments, “reading behind.”)
Okay. Here’s a
current example.
Right now as you are reading this, I am in New York,
accompanying Dr. M on a psychoanalytic conference. (Not as wildly “raucous” as you might
imagine.) I have taken along a “laptop”
but do not know if it will see action.
As a result, I have to preemptively “write ahead.” Otherwise, there’ll be a big “Empty” on my
blog while I’m away.
That’s primarily why I “write ahead”, and my answers consequently
become separated from your questions. I
can “move things around”, answering the questions immediately by bumping the
already scheduled post to a subsequent date.
But, trust me, that does not always work out. I end up losing the rescheduled post, or there
are two posts, published on the same day.
I can, hopefully, train myself to check “View Blog” every
day for incoming comments (since they are no longer transmitted to “Noreplay.”) And I can be more open to the questions that
come in.
Being “ahead” in my writing?
I don’t know what to do about that.
Not only does it provide fill-in material for “real life” interruptions,
it is also a comfort. There is still the
pressure of “What will I write today?”
But if I can’t think of anything, I am bailed out by the accumulated “backlog.” (Note:
The foregoing crisis has not once happened in over eleven years of blog
writing. But tomorrow? Who knows?)
Writing closer to “real time” seems like the answer. But there are meaningful consequences if I do. Help me out, here. Sometimes, I am simply obtuse about these
things. Unless that’s a geometrical
figure, and then I’m something else.
1 comment:
Thank you for responding to my comment. I, too, have seen the change with Blogger that no longer sends comments to your email address. I rarely get a comment on my blog - mainly because I write so infrequently in my blog and partly because the things I say are only interesting to me and my family. And they are all on Facebook now.
About my comment that you wrote about: Actually, I was trying to give you an excuse for not answering questions but, as you point out, my logic was pretty bad. I noticed that you don't often answer questions and I was trying to back you up by saying it would be confusing if you had to answer a question that was too old. But you can (and do) just repeat the original question and it's fine. The only time a delayed answer would be a problem would be for, "Would you like to join me for coffee tomorrow?"
You have answered my questions in the past and now that you have answered this one (not really a question but you understand), I find myself grinning. Where else can you get the attention of someone you admire without leaving your seat?
Thank you, Earl. Every week-day starts out with a reading of your thought provoking posts.
Post a Comment