I am watching a western.
It’s called A Man
Called Sledge (1970), starring James Garner. I am not enjoying it – too grim. But it reminds me of all the James Garner
movies and TV shows I have enjoyed, and
watching the unpleasant A Man Called
Sledge, I enjoy remembering them.
(We take our pleasures where we find them. And lately, with fewer viewing options, due
to comedies that aren’t funny to me, reruns of dramas I have seen too many
times, the news – you don’t need me to tell you about the news – and "Eh" sports without baseball, there is very little left to for me watch. Look at that.
I just blew off an entire blog post in one parenthesis. I have to stop doing that, or I am going to
run out of ideas.)
A Man Called Sledge involves
the robbery of gold bars, stored in a prison.
Here’s the only thing I remember about it.
Stuffing the gold bars into their saddlebags, the banditos skedaddle
out of the prison, throwing the gold-laden saddlebags over their horses. I think immediately about the horses.
OUTLAW HORSE: “That’s heavy! And they’re even on yet!”
That is reflexively where my mind travels. Anticipatorily. I see the outlaws racing for their horses, I
look at their eyes – the horses’, not the outlaws’ – and I see panic.
Like they’re worried their vertebrae are not going to hold up.
“A rider.
Bullion-laden saddlebags. Then
they want us to run? Call my chiropractor! I’m gonna need an appointment!”
That’s what I’m thinking.
And about how much I really liked Maverick.
Next.
I watched a silent movie last night – I’m telling you, there
was nothing!
The Four Horsemen of
the Apocalypse (1921), a film that propelled “Leading Man” Rudolph
Valentino to international stardom and turned the tango into a dance
craze. It also introduced the fashion
alternative of “goucho pants.”
I am not thinking about any
of that. (Nor the powerful, anti-war
message of the movie. I’ve been anti-war
since we sang “Down By the Riverside” at camp.
(“I’m gonna lay down my sword and
shield – bush-duh buh – down by the riverside…”)
As I read the film’s elaborate subtitles, I am thinking about
the American moviegoers back in 1921 when the literacy rate was substantially
lower, not to mention the numerous immigrant
moviegoers, who maybe could read, but
not English.
What did people at silent movies do when they were unable to read the subtitles?
(Anyone else think
about that? Could it possibly be just me?)
People sitting in movie theaters, reading the faces, but not
the “Title Cards.”
“I’ve got a feeling this is important, but I have no idea
what it says.”
How did they handle it?
Did they ask for assistance from somebody nearby?
“Excuse me. What do
those words say?”
Did they go to the movies in pairs?
“I’ll pay, if you read.”
Were there people outside the theater, offering their
specialized services?
“‘Reader!’ – Ten cents for the whole movie!”
People carrying signs:
“Will Translate for Popcorn!”
That’s what I think about.
How inadequately prepared audiences were required to read subtitles
at the movies.
The last one is more delicate. It’s not about movies. It’s about history.
DNA testing has confirmed (with persuasive probability) that,
after his wife Martha passed away, having agreed to promise never to remarry, Thomas
Jefferson fathered six children with his slave-servant Sally Hemings.
INSERT APPROPRRIATE REACTION HERE.
Here’s what I’m thinking about. Besides that appropriate reaction.
Martha Jefferson and Sally Hemings shared the same
father. (You can look up how that
happened.)
Setting aside – momentarily – the inescapable implications
of this slaveholder-slave-servant relationship –
Imagine for a moment – then you can go back to the other thing – the
promised-never-to-remarry Thomas Jefferson, encountering a woman who – barring the
pigmentation discrepancy – bore a “50-percent” genetic resemblance to his
recently departed wife, Martha.
I ponder the entire package.
A package that includes that.
It is simply the way I think. About overworked “bad guy” horses. Helpless illiterates at silent movies. And
about Thomas Jefferson, going, “Holy cow!” (Curious Query: Is there any evidence Jefferson fathered
children with anyone else?)
Some might perceive any sensitive proclivity towards Thomas Jefferson
as an unfathomable betrayal of Sally Hemings.
I understand that. But I can’t
help myself.
Sometimes my mind goes to places that are harmless.
And sometimes,
They go other
places.
It is the same reflexive impulse.
But the reaction to it is different.
No comments:
Post a Comment