He started in television, contributing to the most
prestigious comedies of the day.
So did I.
He wore horn-rimmed glasses.
So, back then, did I.
He was Jewish.
Have you seen my “Birthday” picture? Moving on...
He was born to write.
So apparently was I.
He was fiercely competitive with his, also a writer, older
brother.
So was I.
He was chronically claustrophobic.
So am I.
He almost never reads fiction.
Neither, almost, do either.
He believes you can learn nothing from “genius”, seeing the construction
more easily in the bad and the so-so.
I’ve said exactly the same thing.
He cringes visibly when someone tells him a joke, and can barely
remember a joke himself.
So do I, and neither can I.
He takes great pride in his punctuality.
So do I.
He was a comparative latecomer to the sexual arena.
(“Do I have to admit this?”
It’s on the list.” “O-kay.”)
So was I.
Who was “he”?
Neil Simon. (As I
discovered in his book Memoirs.)
Neil Simon and Earl Pomerantz, though imaginably among
writers of comedy not exclusively
Earl Pomerantz, are considerably alike.
The unrelated-to-writing similarities, such as punctuality and claustrophobia,
were, for me, startlingly “Him too?”
And yet…
Switching subject matter… apparently but not really…
There are these prototypes in Major League Baseball, players
who set the style – the pitching style, the batting style, the fielding
style. You see a young ballplayer, going
through his preparatory paces and their recognizable approach suggests, “Man, that guy’s another…”, a revered giant of
the game immediately popping to mind.
I shall, as an example, focus on one such prototype – the slick–fielding Venezuelan shortstop. (Who were not always Venezuelan but the
initiating handful of them were.)
It began in my recollection with Hall of Famer, slick-fielding Venezuelan shortstop Luis Aparacio,
proceeding seamlessly to slick-fielding Venezuelan shortstop Davey Concepcion. Aparicio won an impressive nine Gold Gloves, honoring the “Best
Shortstop” of that particular season.
Concepcion himself garnered a not-to-be-sneezed-at four Gold Gloves. Each of them had their own identifiable
approach.
Later, it was Ozzie Guillen and Omar Vizquel who successfully
embodied the slick-fielding-Venezuelan-shortstop prototype. It seemed like there was always somebody, someone those who followed blatantly
emulated, worshipfully looked up to and unembarrassingly aspired to become.
I experienced this phenomenon first-hand as the part owner
of a minor league baseball team in South Bend, Indiana. I saw the “A”-ball candidates for the majors,
copying the signature moves of their perennial heroes. And they looked pretty good doing it. You could tell who they were imitating.
None of them got out of the minor leagues.
They were – at their level – respectable duplicates of their
sparkling predecessors. But, one way or
another, they were never the entire package.
Stuff was definitely present. But
there was also, noticeably, stuff that was not.
Neil Simon abandoned television for the Broadway stage and subsequent
feature films.
I remained in television.
Neil Simon handled the crushing pressure of immediate
rewrites.
I spent numerous “Rewrite Nights”, hugging myself and rocking
inconsolably back and forth.
As he got older, Neil Simon risked all, jettisoning crowd-pleasing
comedy for deeper and darker dramatic exploration.
Even here, with virtually nothing at stake, my continued
M.O. remains, “Pleasing and amusing.”
The list of contrasting evaluations is, mercifully,
truncated. (“Allow me some residual dignity.” “You go it.”)
But you can see what I’m driving at.
I am proud of my accomplishments.
Proud, bordering on "Was that really me?" But I lacked some essential ingredients, which took a toll on my
hierarchical positioning.
There are similarities.
And there are
differences.
The similarities get you into the game.
The differences decide who is the prototype and who is the
replica.
No comments:
Post a Comment