I was originally going to use Steve and his son Cam
Bedrosian as my prototype. Then the
hideous tragedy of Debbie Reynolds succumbing the day after daughter Carrie
Fisher pushed that familial example to the fore.
I think I’ll stick with the Bedrosians. Give the other guys a break. Not that I was going to say anything bad
about them. I’ll just use somebody else. Let mother and daughter rest in peace.
Steve Bedrosian, now retired, was a reliable Major League baseball
pitcher, who, while playing for the Philadelphia
Phillies, won the National League’s “Cy
Young Award” as the league’s “Best Pitcher” in 1987.
Cam Bedrosian recently elevated to the “majors” and
appearing to have a promising career ahead of him currently pitches for the Los Angeles Angels. (It just occurred to me that if you slide
across two languages, The Los Angeles Angels is redundant: “The The Angels Angels.” I wonder why I never thought of that
before. Or why I bothered thinking about
it now?)
You consider that unlikely phenomenon – father and a son, both
ascending to the top rung of their highly competitive profession. And there are a surprising number of these examples,
which, at first blush, appears to be an incredible happenstance, akin to two individual
family members, both getting struck by lightning. Unless they were, unfortuitously, holding
hands.
It is brutally difficult to make
it to the Major Leagues. There is not a
lot of room up there. Seven hundred and
fifty players a year. Out of billions on
the planet. (It used to be “out of
millions in America” but now Major League ballplayers come from everywhere –
Australia, Puerto Rico, Korea. Although
not North Korea. (“They won’t let us play.”)
It’s true that not all the Major
League “legacies” are as accomplished as their daddies. Dale Berra – son of Hall of Famer Yogi Berra – had a pedestrian career. On the other hand, although Ken Griffey was an
excellent ballplayer, his son Ken Jr. was a certifiable superstar. Same with Bobby and Barry Bonds, although
Barry illegally “juiced up”, so who knows?
What I am saying is breeding alone is no “can’t miss” guarantee.
Still, you have to consider genetics. Especially
when, as not infrequently occurs because athletes often run into each other – at
gyms, celebrity gatherings, etc. – the progeny’s Mom has exceptional athletic
ability as well. (And look out soon for
mother-daughter examples the WNBA.)
How about “connections” as an
explanation for the “father-son” phenomenon?
“Hey, (baseball executive he was
acquainted with during his playing days), my kid’s pretty good. You ought to give him a look.”
And they do. Which is a substantial step up from, “I’m a
chartered accountant and my son can pitch.”
How much would that help? Beyond doing his kid’s taxes.
Okay, so “leg-upping” heredity
and “door-opening” connections. Of
course, they help to get you there. But
then it’s up to the offspring to stick around.
Case In Point: Pete Rose Jr.
Who wore the same Number (14) as his Dad but other than that, there were
no similarities. Pete Rose Senior was
the all-time Major Leagues “hits king”, with a lifetime 4,256 hits. Pete Rose Jr., in his brief Major League tenure – 2 hits. Pete Jr.’s Dad may well have opened a few
doors. But those doors close
precipitously when you bat .143.
(A Personal Side Note: One season, I saw Pete Rose Jr. play for the Minor
League South Bend Silver Hawks, of
which I was then a part owner. What I
recall most vividly – because Pete Jr.’s father was famously banned forever
from baseball because he gambled on the games – was a witty fan yelling from
the stands when the lumbering Pete Jr. came up to the plate: “We’re betting on you, Pete!” I believe he
struck out.)
Going beyond heredity and
connections, the predominant reasons explaining the statistical anomaly of
father and son both advancing to the Major Leagues, I offer another factor
that, to me, is, if not entirely overlooked, then mistakenly underappreciated.
Anyone wishing to make it in a
seemingly unattainable “dream enterprise” like baseball (or show business,
pulling an example out of the air) will enjoy a hefty advantage experiencing “demystification
resulting from longtime personal exposure.”
Call it the “Ho-hum Factor.”
I had, thankfully, no interest in
doing this, but say, as a fantasizing youngster, I decided I wanted a career in
“bull dogging” in the rodeo. I look around – my father’s in dry goods and my
grandfather’s a tailor.
Contrast that biographical
happenstance with another young hopeful whose father’s a professional rodeo
“bull dogger.”
You see what I’m talking
about? Who’s more likely to wind up
wrestling cattle to the ground? A boy
drilled in counting t-shirts by the dozen, or a kid who’s seen his Dad come
home, partially gored but with a commemorative belt buckle?
Not because of natural
ability. Not because of connections. But because they saw their Daddy do it on a
regular basis, their career not some
unattainable “Hold Grail”, but simply “going to work and doing their job.” So when it’s your turn – “What do you do?” – “I’m in the ‘Family Business’.” (And it’s not just in sports. My cardiologist Nicole’s father was a
cardiologist. It works the same way in
hearts.)
It’s as simple as that. Having seen it done regularly…
You perceive it as doable.
So you do it.
No guarantee you’ll be successful.
But it’s no “Unreachable Star.”
No comments:
Post a Comment