Sometimes, I actually pay attention to what I’m writing
about. Not that I am on other occasions “Sleep-writing.” It’s that, now and then, my mind returns to an
earlier post, and I think, “Wow. I meant
to say that. But I did not mean to say what
“what I meant to say” reveals inadvertently about me.
And then I go “Oo-ooh.”
And not in a good
way.
For example,
I have, on numerous occasions, cast negative aspersions on recent
alterations in our communicational process, which now include, as I have before
derisively decried, smart people starting their responses with “So…”, and
people throughout the “Smart Spectrum’s”
voices “going up” at the end of their sentences? As if they are asking a question? That question invariably being, “Do you know
what I’m saying?” Requiring the listener
to then respond, when their accepted “Level of Commitment” to the encounter was
“Just listening.”
I say, if the
speaker requires positive reinforcement concerning the clarity and persuasiveness
of their positions, perhaps, before opening their mouths, they should consider
a way of communicating their positions better. Or consider the possibility that they’re
wrong, clamming up and allowing me to communicate my positions instead, positions that have never once begged for encouraging validation.
Aside from the now insistent obligation to communicate –
verbally or otherwise – that I do indeed
understand what they’re saying, the current “Expectation of Courtesy” denies me
the alternative of “simply listening”, because,
THE SPEAKER: “Hey, Jerk Face, I just asked you a question!”
I am also opposed to
how this currently accepted speech pattern sounds
– that wan, desperately musical “upward veer”?
To me, it sounds like the speaker has suddenly lost their mind, eerily confusing
a “Declarative Sentence” with a “Question.”
But then I thought
about that. I have a lot of time on my
hands. See: Yesterday’s post, revealing that there is so
little for me to watch on TV. With the implied
(and accurate) suggestion that I am unable to turn the thing off, nor able to
keep it off in the first place.
Television is the default soundtrack of my boredom. (I’m not sure about that one: “TMI”?
Or “An evocative turn of phrase”?)
It now belatedly occurs to me that when I complain about
unwanted “Speech Music” and unwelcome additions of the word “So…”, what I am tacitly
implying is:
“I’m old.”
To which the reasonable response is:
“That’s what we do
now. Get over it!”
I did not deliberately mean
to sound old. (Why would I?) I intended instead
to be beloved comedian Jerry Seinfeld, offering
wry “Did you ever notice?” observations on the way the people today talk.
Instead, the “self-inflicted wound” headline is:
“You see? The guy is
definitely ‘past it’.”
I have no enthusiasm for “past it.” It sounds too close to “passed away.”
Now, here’s where I defend myself.
Though possibly irreparably too late.
It is not that I am
opposed to contemporary trends in
interpersonal communication. (Though the
previous sentence sounds conspicuously stodgy.
Something I picked up in a library.)
And it is not that I am a particular “Language Stickler.” (Or “Punctuation Stickler”, for that matter; I
have no idea if the period in the above sentence goes before or after the
quotation marks. And, by the way, I
don’t care. I am “that casual” about the
whole thing.)
Let me say this, in my “This is not about ‘old’” defense:
In the sixties, when everyone around me was saying, “Groovy”
and “Chill out”? –
I never once said,
“Groovy” or “Chill out.”
In the fifties, when I was a teenager, supposedly desperate
to fit in,
I never once said, “Quite the…” (as in “That girl’s quite
the ‘Brainiac’.”) “Or “Knuckle sandwich.” (Although I did occasionally say
“Cowabunga.”)
It’s not that I was snooty, looming loftily above the conversational
fray.
I was a slang-bucking revolutionary.
Throughout every passing era of “Trendy Talk”, I have defied
the “Cultural Dictators” of the day. Everyone
else was saying, “See you later, Alligator”?
I wouldn’t be caught dead
responding,
“After ‘while, Croco-dile.”
I mean, what am I
– “Sheep”?
Just to say – this is no late-blooming aversion. I stood up to the “cool jargon” of every
generation I ever lived through. (With the
exception of the word “cool”, whose proven durability has survived innumerable “Patois Cycles”, remaining to this day, “very
cool.”)
My lifelong crusade was been to spit in the conforming face
of “Fashionable Parlance.” That is
simply the way I am.
Uh-oh.
Have I inadvertently “blown my cover” again?
Oh no. I believe I
have.
The “Inferred Message” this time:
“The guy’s always
been old.”
Well…
Maybe that’s true.
Maybe I have
always been old.
There is, however, a bolstering upside to that peculiar proclivity:
I am spectacularly good at it now.
1 comment:
Perhaps you're like George Bailey in It's a Wonderful Life. George and his father are discussing the idea of Harry, the younger brother, taking George's place at the Building and Loan and his father says that Harry is pretty young for the job. George says that he was the same age when he started there and his father says, "Maybe. You were born older, George."
That's you, Earl. You were just born older.
Post a Comment